Hi,
Stephen Childs wrote:
> Frederic Schaer wrote:
>
>> Right...
>> I'll prepare the test for the next release anyway...
>
>
> Would it be possible to change the test so that it checks that the CA
> RPM version number is greater than or equal to the "latest" version
> defined in the SFT code? For example: if "latest version" is defined
> to 31, then sites with version number 32 would pass but those with
> version number 30 would fail.
I guess it could be. The test has to be re-designed anyway...
> This way sites that are eager to upgrade will not start failing tests.
> Or would this conflict with the policy of waiting for the LCG CA
> rpmlist to be updated?
That's a good question indeed. I had in mind to raise it at next GDA
since there are now quite a few sites which have the 0.32 CA RPMs (which
are not yet officially part of LCG).
Cheers,
Fred
>
>
>
> Stephen
>
|