 |
 |
Hi, Stephen Childs wrote: > Frederic Schaer wrote: > >> Right... >> I'll prepare the test for the next release anyway... > > > Would it be possible to change the test so that it checks that the CA > RPM version number is greater than or equal to the "latest" version > defined in the SFT code? For example: if "latest version" is defined > to 31, then sites with version number 32 would pass but those with > version number 30 would fail. I guess it could be. The test has to be re-designed anyway... > This way sites that are eager to upgrade will not start failing tests. > Or would this conflict with the policy of waiting for the LCG CA > rpmlist to be updated? That's a good question indeed. I had in mind to raise it at next GDA since there are now quite a few sites which have the 0.32 CA RPMs (which are not yet officially part of LCG). Cheers, Fred > > > > Stephen >