JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ARCHIVES-NRA Archives


ARCHIVES-NRA Archives

ARCHIVES-NRA Archives


ARCHIVES-NRA@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARCHIVES-NRA Home

ARCHIVES-NRA Home

ARCHIVES-NRA  2005

ARCHIVES-NRA 2005

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: cataloguing large collections using CALM

From:

Chris Hilton <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Chris Hilton <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 9 Jun 2005 10:16:20 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (107 lines)

In that case, if there's a consensus that people are interested and don't
consider detail about the capacities of a particular system to be
advertising, here it is.
Chris Hilton


Our experience at the Wellcome Library has been as follows (numbers relate
to Charlotte's queries):

1/2: cataloguers at the Wellcome Library have done both, depending on time
and sorting space available.  For instance, a short-term cataloguer taken
on as part of a project might well be asked simply to catalogue and leave
the physical sorting for later clear-up: in that case it's easier to apply
temporary numbers and rearrange into the tree at the end of the process,
providing the cataloguer can keep things straight in her/his head in the
meantime.  In general we'd say that setting out the tree first makes things
slightly easier and recommend that in our manual but both can be made to
work.

3/4/5: a lot of our legacy data used simple alphanumeric references, with
blocks of running numbers to designate series.  For instance, if SA/EUG is
the collection reference (SA meaning Societies and Associations, EUG the
identifier of the specific body) then SA/EUG/A might be a section and
SA/EUG/A.1-40 a series within that, SA/EUG/A.41-80 the next series, and so
forth, with the item references below that looking like SA/EUG/A.11.
Clearly that doesn't stack properly using RefNo so our solution has been to
use AltRefNo for the reference that the reader sees, which continues to be
the one used in the old typed list, whilst RefNo houses a tweaked version
which enables stacking.  Our normal practice in generating the tweaked
reference is to take the first number in a run as setting the identity of
that series in the reference: in the example above, for example, the series
would be SAEUG/A (we omit the first slash in RefNo to prevent all Societies
and Associations building into one unwieldy tree!), the two series
SAEUG/A/1 and SAEUG/A/41 and the items within them would be SAEUG/A/1/1.

This is particularly useful for our older material, where we have
collections distributed around a old-fashioned manuscript sequence that
simply gives running numbers: where a collection's reference ends up
looking like MSS.1180-1218, 1233, 2048-2069, 2802-2819, 3014-3072, 3587-
3588, 3662-3663, 4220, 4257, 4302-4306, 4487-4489, 5222-5249 and 7966 (an
extreme example I admit) you need something very different in RefNo.  The
same principles apply using the initial number of a run a setting its
identity: in that example, MS.1180 is four levels down and its RefNo is
MS1180/1180/1180/1180.

For new cataloguing of hierarchical collections we try to have RefNo and
AltRefNo look the same (apart from omitting that initial slash) and of
course new complex material now goes into a hierarchical arrangement rather
than being shoe-horned into a manuscript sequence.  I suppose, however,
that you could carry on with the twin-reference system, one for work and
one for show, if you felt that references were getting too long.  We
haven't had to do any very long inserts, only the occasional items which
can be accommodated by calling them SA/EUG/A.11A or the like, but I would
expect that long blocks could be slotted in less obtrusively if you have a
twin-reference system in effect.

Obviously you want to make sure that AltRefNo is the thing that readers
use.  In our web interface (http://archives.wellcome.ac.uk) we've masked
the RefNo field so that all the reader sees is a clickable link
saying "click to browse" (search on Reference = MS.1180 for an example).

6. As you can tell we adapted CALM to accommodate existing cataloguing
styles (we computerised at around about the time we merged two departments,
so we were dealing with modern archive material catalogued hierarchically
and a completely different tradition of older material given manuscript
numbers). The good news is that CALM was flexible enough to handle both.

If you'd like to see our cataloguing manual which goes into more detail on
these, Charlotte, I can send you a copy.

Chris Hilton

Dr. Christopher Hilton
Senior Archivist, Department of Archives and Manuscripts
Wellcome Library for the History & Understanding of Medicine
The Wellcome Trust
210 Euston Road
LONDON NW1 2BE

On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 00:41:25 +0100, Aidan Jones <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Elizabeth Oxborrow-Cowan" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 2:53 PM
>Subject: Re: cataloguing large collections using CALM
>
>
>> Dear All
>>
>>  I for one would rather like to read about the nitty gritty of using
>> applications.  This does help spread information about how these packages
>> are being used and with what success.  No doubt others will have opinions
>on
>> this one.
>
>Exactly.  People might then be stimulated to add their own contributions.
>And nobody on this list is ever forced to read through a "long slab of
>nitty-gritty on a particular application" if they don't want to (most
>postings will get deleted).  However, they might still want to refer to the
>discussion at a later date - especially if it has been made readily
>accessible via the Archives of ARCHIVES-NRA.
>http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/archives-nra.html
>
>Aidan Jones,
>Cumbria (Barrow)

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager