Is there a risk that if every subsequent event is perceived as potentially
being causally related to its antecedents, then the term "causal" will be
so ubiquitous as to become meaningless?
Michael
At 19:47 09/01/2005, Charles Burnette wrote:
>I think the point here is not that the proposal has no effect - just not the
>linear classically causal effect that may have been intended. If a proposal
>is ignored that to me qualifies as an effect (that is even measurable).
>
>chuck
************************************************************
Dr Michael A R Biggs
Associate Dean Research and Reader in Visual Communication
School of Art and Design, University of Hertfordshire
College Lane, Hatfield, AL10 9AB
UK
T 00 44 (0)1707 285341
F 00 44 (0)1707 285350
E <[log in to unmask]>
http://www.herts.ac.uk/artdes/research/tvad/biggs1.html
For information about University research in art and design visit
http://www.herts.ac.uk/artdes/research/
************************************************************
|