Fil
On 12/1/05 9:36 AM, "Filippo A. Salustri" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> My reading of what Chuck wrote suggests to me that he thinks (correct me
> if I'm wrong, Chuck) that there is intention and other aspects of
> theorists that are in the context in which the theory was developed, but
> that the theory itself doesn't contain those aspects.
You read me wrongly. My theory specifically incorporates intention into any
theory as you will see if you read my piece "Intentionality and Design" in
the DRS Proceedings for Common Ground conference. Although Klaus should
reply for himself (and I hope he does); I think he is the one seeking to
remove intention from theory.
Chuck
|