Assuming there is nothing wrong with the batch or technique, then the
quality of the samples may be another possibility. The manufacturer of
the cartridges that we are about to introduce claim that false negatives
are very rare, but they do suggest some explanations of false negatives;
1.Urine specimens contaminated with blood may affect the fluid flow on
the test strip, producing false negative results. This might be relevant
for your first case.
2.If the patients were catheterized, then the lubricating gel used prior
to catheterisation may also decrease fluid flow on the test strip
(although experience from our current pregnancy test strips shows that
the lubricating gel used by our Trust causes false positive pregnancy
tests).
Margaret McDonnell
-----Original Message-----
From: Clinical biochemistry discussion list
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Wills Philip
(Queen Elizabeth Hospital NHS Trust)
Sent: 20 December 2005 17:14
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: ?False negative urine pregnancy results/Christmas Quiz
I would be grateful for possible explanations for the two
following cases of alleged false negative urine pregnancy
testing results using a well known kit with cut-off 25 U/l.
Please assume there is nothing wrong with the batch. All
obvious actions are underway and the company has been
informed. The kit performs perfectly well in EQA although
this particular batch was not used. Staff in A/E have had
training updated although there is no indication that the
test was not performed correctly.
CASE ONE
Came to A/E with abdominal pain on 9/11/05 and also 12/11/05.
Urine Pregnancy Test in A&E negative on both visits.
Came to A&E again 15/11/05 with abdominal pain
"Just finished period" - 13/11/05(? date of bleed prior to
that.)
Doctor performed a Urine Pregnancy Test approx 08.00h on
15/11/05 (despite 2 recent negatives) which was positive.
Serum beta HCG taken 10.34h on 15/11/05 was 2650 U/l.
The patient had an ectopic pregnancy, which had been missed
on the first 2 occasions. Patient is now doing well.
CASE TWO
Presented 15/11/05. Known to be 8 weeks pregnant. Presented
with hyperemesis, but Urine Pregnancy Test at triage, approx
15.45 was negative. Doctor repeated Urine Pregnancy Test
himself on same sample - again negative. Then asked patient
to provide another sample, which he tested himself, which was
also negative. That is 3 negative tests on 2 samples. Doctor
sent serum beta HCG, approx 16.30h on 15/11/05. The result
was greater than 10000 U/L
No adverse outcome in either case.
PS I have just checked 20 of the "suspect" cassettes against
20 consecutive ex EQA material stored at -20 C and got 100%
correct answers.
Many thanks,Phil Wills
************************************************************************
***
This e-mail is confidential and privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please accept our apologies; please do not disclose, copy or
distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in reliance on
its
contents: to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Please
inform us that this message has gone astray before deleting it. Thank
you for your co-operation.
************************************************************************
***
------ACB discussion List Information--------
This is an open discussion list for the academic and clinical
community working in clinical biochemistry.
Please note, archived messages are public and can be viewed
via the internet. Views expressed are those of the individual and
they are responsible for all message content.
ACB Web Site
http://www.acb.org.uk
List Archives
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html
List Instructions (How to leave etc.)
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/
|