On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Norman Gray wrote:
> Al,
>
> On 2004 Oct 7 , at 16.43, Mark Taylor wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Alasdair Allan wrote:
> >>> The pcs/string libraries are not installed,
> >>
> >> *scratch head*
> >>
> >> Shouldn't typing "make" in pcs/ build the pcs/string/ library?
>
> No -- pcs isn't a component directory, so the make targets in there
> aren't much more than dummys. Their real function is to allow the
> bootstrapping to be percolated into the child directories.
>
I still don't agree with this. PCS should really be PCS rather than
lots of tiny packages. [and it makes the subpar problem hard to fix for
shared libraries]
--
Tim Jenness
JAC software
http://www.jach.hawaii.edu/~timj
|