medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture
> "The polyphonic music of the late medieval and renaissance Church is a
> conscious attempt to imitate the song of the angels. No single human
> being can sing without ceasing: we need to draw breath. But a choir of
> three or four or five voices can do an impression of angels' song,
> because when one voice pauses the others continue, and so the praises
> never fall silent. Do listen to a Mass by Palestrina or Byrd with this
> in mind."
I disagree with this, poetically attractive though it may be. The developent
of music from plainchant until the Renaissance was basically one of of
simple elaboration. The underlying principle is structuring of sound, NOT of
any conscious striving for a particular sonorous effect in itself.
Plainchant was elaborated by the addition of material. These are tropes.
They inserted extra words, to commentate on the main text. Sometimes,
instead of troping horizontally with interlardings, a trope would be added
vertically in the form of a second voice with the plainchant, singing the
same words but different pitches. This was organum. (Sure, the treatises
regarded organum as an expression of divine order, with the consonances a
demonstration the divine proportion. There was a tendency for metaphor to
lag behind practical reality in this area. One tends to find a musical
development or practice long before one finds a theologian imaginative
enough to come up with a metaphor for it.)
Once this had happened, all that happened over the next few hundred years
was the gradual elaboration of the melody. The Mass settings of most
composers up to around 1550 are based on pre-existing melodies, and the
structure of the music is a network around them. The music is much more like
an encrustation in a jeweller's setting than a new aesthetic object in
itself.
(The famous reference I know of to "voices of angels" relating to this music
dates from the end of the fifteenth century and is a reference to English
choirs at that time. This was in response to a new kind of sound being
created in England and was expressed as exceptional, not the norm.)
If I were to draw any kind of inference from the symbolic gesture of the
plainchant underpinning Masses (although it was sometimes popular songs
too), I would refer to the Divine Logos instead, seeing the melody as a
vibration of the divine, carrying the Word.
To say that composers were "consciously trying to create" something that is
later imputed is teleological, and serves pastoral purposes, not historical
ones. (Even if it does help foster modern devotion and allow a modern to
find something in this music that otherwise is a little alien.)
In fact, as far as I can tell, polyphony was not regarded as the music of
heaven, but as an earthly "device" (which is what the word "organum"
means) - like the architecture of a cathedral, its clock, or the filigree
design of a chalice. It was the freshest, modern music. Funky, witty,
ingenious, full of personality, invention and change. Not stuffy and
overly-pious. Consider Dante, and the fact that he has all of his characters
in Purgatory and Paradise singing plainchant, not polyphony.
Rob Howe.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill East" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 7:52 AM
Subject: [M-R] Preface (4)
medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture
Preface (4)
Leaving aside for a moment the Embolism, which gives each preface its
particular character, we come to what Ward and Johnson call the
Eschatocol, which is a very fancy word for a concluding formula. It was
brought into being by the introduction of the Sanctus, which as we have
seen was not there in the prayer of Hippolytus. The eschatocol is a
sort of hymn leading up to the Sanctus, and we need to look at that
first in order to understand the eschatocol. The Oxford Dictionary of
the Christian Church gives this account of the Sanctus:
"The hymn of praise which follows the Preface in the Eucharist and
begins with the words 'Holy, holy, holy' (Isaiah 6:3). It appeared in
some synagogue prayers, and, thogh used by Christians from an early
date, it was not apparently part of the earliest Eucharistic rite; the
allusion to it in St Clement of Rome (1 Clem. 34:6f) need not be
liturgical. By 350, however, its use in the Eucharist in most Eastern
and some Western Churches is reported in the treatise 'De Spiritu
Sancto' attributed to St Ambrose. Its use in the East is attestede by
sermons ascribed to Asterius, by St Gregory of Nyssa and St John
Chrysostom. It may have been introduced in Rome by Sixtus III (432-40)
but it was slow to be established in the West and as late as 529 the
Council of Vaison had to direct that it be always included. To the
angelic cry 'Sanctus' was soon added the human acclamation 'Benedictus
qui venit' (Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord. Hosanna in
the highest). This is found in the 8th-cent Latin rite, the Eastern
liturgies of St James and St Chrysostom . . ."
The Sanctus derives from Isaiah 6:3, the prophet's vision in the
Temple:
In the year that King Uzziah died I saw the Lord sitting upon a throne,
high and lifted up; and his train filled the temple. Above him stood
the seraphim; each had six wings; with two he covered his face, and
with two he covered his feet [a euphemism for 'private parts'] and with
two he flew. And one called to another and said, 'Holy, holy, holy is
the Lord of hosts; the whole earth is full of his glory.'
This is reprised at Revelation 4:8
And the four living creatures, each of them with six wings, are full of
eyes all round and within, and day and night they never cease to sing,
'Holy, holy, holy, is the Lord God Almighty, who was and is and is to
come.'
This insistence that the angelic beings never cease their song is
theologically important, and is alluded to, as we shall see, in the
eschatocol. The point is that the angels worship God ceaselessly. We
cannot do this, since we need to pause for breath, to eat and sleep and
get on with our lives, but when we come to Mass we join in, for a few
minutes, with the worship that is being offered ceaselessly in heaven.
The polyphonic music of the late medieval and renaissance Church is a
conscious attempt to imitate the song of the angels. No single human
being can sing without ceasing: we need to draw breath. But a choir of
three or four or five voices can do an impression of angels' song,
because when one voice pauses the others continue, and so the praises
never fall silent. Do listen to a Mass by Palestrina or Byrd with this
in mind.
The Benedictus which follows the Sanctus and has at some times been
regarded as part of it, at other times as a separate song, derives from
the story of Christ's entry into Jerusalem at Matthew 21:9,
And the crowds that went before him and that followed him shouted,
'Hosanna to the Son of David! Blessed is he who comes in the name of
the Lord! Hosanna in the highest!'
It is thought appropriate to sing this at this point because Christ is
believed to be about to enter his city, that is to take up residence on
the altar under the forms of bread and wine.
[It was no doubt for this reason that Cranmer omitted the Benedictus
from his translation of the Mass; he had no expectation that Christ
would make a personal appearance during the consecration. Again, I
mention this to demonstrate that these texts are charged with
potentially controversial meaning.]
The phrase 'Hosanna in the highest' is also transferred to the end of
the Sanctus, so that the full Latin text of the Sanctus/Benedictus is:
Sanctus, Sanctus, Sanctus,
Dominus Deus Sabaoth.
Pleni sunt cæli et terra gloria tua.
Hosanna in excelsis.
Benedictus qui venit
in nomine Domini.
Hosanna in excelsis.
Next time we shall go back to the eschatocol and see how it introduces
the Sanctus.
Bill.
=====
____________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping"
your friends today! Download Messenger Now
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html
**********************************************************************
To join the list, send the message: join medieval-religion YOUR NAME
to: [log in to unmask]
To send a message to the list, address it to:
[log in to unmask]
To leave the list, send the message: leave medieval-religion
to: [log in to unmask]
In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to:
[log in to unmask]
For further information, visit our web site:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/medieval-religion.html
**********************************************************************
To join the list, send the message: join medieval-religion YOUR NAME
to: [log in to unmask]
To send a message to the list, address it to:
[log in to unmask]
To leave the list, send the message: leave medieval-religion
to: [log in to unmask]
In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to:
[log in to unmask]
For further information, visit our web site:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/medieval-religion.html
|