> > I think two months to get a fully mature system which has everything in
> > it and is as reliable as the old system is very optimistic.
I'd just like to second David's sentiments. In addition I'm still
working on stuff in /classic and haven't yet had exposure to the new
system, waiting for things to settle down. I want somewhere familiar to
make bug fixes and improvements, which I can readily make available
to users.
> I think that depends very much on what as seen as a priority. If we all
> down tools and work only on the conversion to CVS, I think one to two
> months is a pretty decent estimate.
That's just impractical. We still have our users to support, and
offering good support is more important than ever with the review
upcoming. The last few weekends I've had requests for new ORAC-DR
recipes for observing runs the following week. I'm working on one now.
Yes CVS conversion can be given greater weight, but we can't work on CVS
conversion exclusively.
Malcolm
|