Did Starlink get to 665 SUNs?
..David
-----Original Message-----
From: Starlink development
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: 26/03/2004 17:28
Subject: Re: Documentation
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Norman Gray wrote:
> Norman
> [aghast at the notion that the reason for reusing document numbers was
> so that Mike's listing wouldn't go over 80 columns. Gasp!]
I'm rather relieved - the only reason I could think of before Pat's
interjection was some sort of numerological parsimony which would
be a sight weirder.
--
Mark Taylor Starlink Programmer Physics, Bristol University, UK
[log in to unmask] +44-117-928-8776 http://www.star.bris.ac.uk/~mbt/
|