> Hum, no , I meant, two edg-job-get-output on the same job (string).
>
> I considered that was MY mistake, so I did not register it as a bug.
Phew. Yes, that is reasonable behaviour -- to overwrite the local copy.
However the RB should still deal with it gracefully. It is quite
conceivable that two different people in different locations will try to
retreive the same job output at the same time, and I would say they
should be perfectly allowed to do so! (ok, digital certificate issues
aside -- assuming they are both somehow "authorized" to do so).
Ian.
--
Ian Stokes-Rees [log in to unmask]
Particle Physics, Oxford http://www-pnp.physics.ox.ac.uk/~stokes
|