Dear Lubomir, I agree with you that the discussion clearly enters the
political domain, but I fail to understand why you consider your
point of view to be non-political?
I think you support a very strong political position that seems to
claim superiority over other political positions by claiming to be
politically neutral.
I do not see that design can ever be non-political - how could design
research be that? (but then I do not see how it could be so much
science either, sorry...)
best, kh
...
At 10:34 -0500 28.2.2004, Lubomir S. Popov wrote:
>Hello dear colleagues,
>
>As usual, I would respectfully disagree with most of you. The discussion on
>the review went too political, as usual. I detect too many indications for
>construing the problem as political -- in terms of power, resources, trust,
>abuse, etc. I agree that you are right -- life is about power. However,
>when science becomes about power, it is not science any more. It becomes
>politics.
|