JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN  2004

PHD-DESIGN 2004

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

List etiquette and ethics [was: avatars]

From:

Ken Friedman <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Ken Friedman <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 18 Oct 2004 11:57:27 +0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (95 lines)

Dear Colleagues,

This morning, I woke up to discover a post ["avatars"] wondering
whether I am Cindy Jackson. I am not Cindy Jackson. I have noticed
that Cindy often shares my viewpoint, but a common viewpoint does not
mean a pseudonym.

The choice of a shared view on Heidegger as evidence for a pseudonym
is interesting. If we were the only two people to note Heidegger's
opaque and difficult prose, it would be a different matter.

If I were to find the best evidence for suggesting that Cindy is my
avatar, I'd have pointed to that lovely compilation she posted after
a research request on philosophy of design. That's exactly what I
believe people should do, and what I request that people ought to do
when they use the list to gather information. But then, if I had
compiled that fine collection, I'd have posted it in my own name.

Cindy may find Alan Sokal's post rude. Since I have occasionally
wanted to say some of the things Cindy said, I don't. I wondered why
Dr. Sokal borrowed Hans Blix's email account to post here, but that's
another story.

Dr. Sokal's post asks a good question. What sort of list etiquette
and ethics do we want? I've asked exactly that question myself. When
I have asked, there have been a few responses but little extended
discussion. There are very few rules here. During the on-line
conference last year, one list member argued that even these rules
don't exist. The rules concerning list governance are established by
JISCMAIL. This is the discussion list service of JISC, the Joint
Information Systems Committee of UK educational institutions in the
post-secondary sector. These rules govern all JISCmail lists, but the
list member required us to use a couple of days to clarify an issue
that should have been clear from my statements as conference
convener. A thoughtful response from another list member prompted me
to suggest that he moderate a specific discussion on this theme, but
he did not want to take it up at that time.

Perhaps it is time for us to consider these issues.

So far, we have very few rules. Anyone may launch a thread on any
topic at any time. While we have a specific range of topics related
to design research and doctoral education in design, all topics are
welcome. Anyone may write at length in careful developed, well
referenced posts. No one is required to write scholarly or scientific
notes: direct person comments are welcome. No one may call for a
thread to end while any list member wishes to carry it forward.

The JISC rules govern all JISCMAIL lists. Apart from technical rules,
only one JISCMAIL rule affects on-list protocol. This is the fact
that JISCMAIL list owners are the final governing authority on any
list. A list owner "owns" the list on behalf of JISC. He or she sets
standards, establishes or changes rules, imposes standards, and has
full authority over list membership and activities. Our list owners
are David Durling and Keith Russell. David and Keith are fairly low
key. They mostly enable us to pursue the conversations that emerge
from the protocol established after La Clusaz, the few rules stated
above. The only time times that either list owner has ever intervened
have been occasions when a subscriber repeatedly interrupted list
discourse or refused to recognize that a designated process with
special rules was under way. To my knowledge, that has only happened
two or three times in the six years since the list was established.

The question of list etiquette and ethics probably involves more
issues than whether or not an "avatar" is acceptable here. This would
include some of the issues I raised during and after the on-line
conference. And it might well include issues raised off-list by
subscribers who have occasionally felt uncomfortable with the list.

I wanted to take a moment to reflect on Alan Sokal's post and to
suggest that it may be a good moment to reflect on etiquette and
ethics in several dimensions.

What do others think?

Best regards,

Ken

--

Ken Friedman
Professor of Leadership and Strategic Design
Department of Leadership and Organization
Norwegian School of Management

Design Research Center
Denmark's Design School

+47 06600           Tlf NSM
+47 67.55.73.23    Tlf Office
+47 33.40.10.95    Tlf Privat

email: [log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager