Dear Rosan and Ken et al.,
I think that there are design solutions and paths of action that can
satisfy both Rosan's probably constructive intentions and the other
opinions concerning her proposed solution that were so far expressed
in this discussion. It is easy to get stuck in the critique of a
proposal than to find a better solution.
I'd like to propose that we'd redirect to finding a design direction
as opposed to analyzing the flaws and risking to continue the
personifying of the issues.
I'd be interested in finding out what it is, Rosan, that you are
expecting that your proposition of a new practice here on the list
would actually produce? Is there another way to get there?
If you want that those whose work is criticized now without names
could find out about it, what could be another way for that to happen?
kh
|