Yes it does - income-related subscription rates are based entirely on
members' declared earnings, and this would include all members who are
working part time or in job shares.
Tim Buckley Owen.
-----Original Message-----
From: David McMenemy [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 29 October 2004 16:23
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Re : 44% of us earn #17K (or less) - the figure is actually
36%
Does the 17k figure include those who are job-sharers or part-time too?
Would put an entirely different slant on the 36% if it did.
-----Original Message-----
From: Chartered Library and Information Professionals
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Tim Buckley Owen
Sent: 29 October 2004 15:59
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Re : 44% of us earn #17K (or less) - the figure is actually
36%
Just on a point of information again...
It is actually 36% of CILIP members who are on income-related
subscription
rates and who declare incomes of 17,000 or less - not 44%.
The 44% figure refers to income-related subscription payers who earn
between
17,000 and 22,000, and finally there are 20% earning above 22,000.
N.B. These percentages refer only to those members who are on
income-related
rates, and don't take into account categories such as affiliated or
supporting or expatriate members, who are on a flat rate already.
Tim Buckley Owen.
-----Original Message-----
From: Julia Johnson [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 29 October 2004 15:38
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re : 44% of us earn #17K (or less)
I was horrified to learn that 44% of CILIP's members are on ?17K or
less.
Leaving aside the contemplation of salaries of ?10K- 12K.
As those of us who work in London know, a second-jobber secretary with
A-levels (and secretarial college, I assume) can earn more than that (My
employer is seeking someone of that ilk, and I believe the salary is
?25K-?28K)
If I had my time over, I would make sure I had decent IT, document
production and related skills. I think that I might never have been
unemployed, while I looked for information work. If I had been lost to
the
profession, then that would have been the operation of "market forces".
Regards
Julia Johnson
|