sure, we could speak of many allusions for this question, and wall's
article mentions quite a few. I think the thought has been voiced in
many ways, but does that answer the question. I ask because this is
such an important question regarding action. at least for me. i think
one can be frozen in the undecideable, but at some point must act or
decide. sorry to move back and forth between terminologies and
histories, but the overall point is the same. how can we separate and
prioritize time-image over action and what does this imply for action.
r
On Friday, July 30, 2004, at 01:00 PM, Automatic digest processor wrote:
> Sorry to snip here, reni, but could the allusion here be to
> Heideggerian
> gelassenheit, waiting upon (not for) be-ing? Neither active nor
> passive but
> the very ground or possibility of both.
>
> I'm utterly new to this list having joined through an interest in
> Malick
> fostered by Wall's article on his films and Malick's connection with
> Heidegger.
>
> regards
>
> michaelP
>
_______________________________________________
Dr. Reni Celeste
Research Scholar, Yale University
Visiting Assistant Professor, Connecticut College
http://www.cinemonkeys.com/reni/
*
*
Film-Philosophy Email Discussion Salon.
After hitting 'reply' please always delete the text of the message you are replying to.
To leave, send the message: leave film-philosophy to: [log in to unmask]
For help email: [log in to unmask], not the salon.
**
|