We see this as well. I am surprised its as low as 8%. The JHO's do the A/E bloods and phlebotomists the routine ward bloods. JHO's ability to take bloods has diminished markedly here and no-one formally teaches them. Look at how lots of nurses take bloods...it will frighten you. Same resons apply.
>>> Ian Barlow <[log in to unmask]> 11/25/04 08:51am >>>
Dear colleagues,
A relatively high proportion (8.5%) of our A/E samples are haemolysed. In
contrast only 2.5% of routine ward samples are haemolysed.
Is this due to the collapsed nature of the patients, poor venesection
techniques or are there other explanations?
I seem to remember this being discussed previously - were there any
conclusions/explanations?
Best wishes,
Ian Barlow
Scunthorpe
UK
------ACB discussion List Information--------
This is an open discussion list for the academic and clinical
community working in clinical biochemistry.
Please note, archived messages are public and can be viewed
via the internet. Views expressed are those of the individual and
they are responsible for all message content.
ACB Web Site
http://www.acb.org.uk
List Archives
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html
List Instructions (How to leave etc.)
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/
------ACB discussion List Information--------
This is an open discussion list for the academic and clinical
community working in clinical biochemistry.
Please note, archived messages are public and can be viewed
via the internet. Views expressed are those of the individual and
they are responsible for all message content.
ACB Web Site
http://www.acb.org.uk
List Archives
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html
List Instructions (How to leave etc.)
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/
|