> I do not think it is useful to make vague allegations such as:
> "Is it just me or does anyone else suspect that there have been as many
> dodgy uses of data in some of the recent radstats postings as there might
> be on the migrationwatch website?
>
> Which person or persons are you referring to? Which specific data do you
> allege has been treated in a dodgy way?
> If you wish to criticise, which is perfectly fair, I think it is best to
> call a spade a spade or else not to say anything.
The problem seems to be that anyone who speaks out on this list risks about
migration runs the risk of being the subject of a diatribe of statistics and
being called a supporter of the abuse of children. Not good for the
reputation of Radstats. I'm a bit surprised that an apparently libellous
message was not removed by the list owner. It seems to be safer at the
moment to call a spade a sexual pervert! than to stick the head above a
statistical parapet.
Did anyone find the allegedly pornographic image? I only saw images of
beautiful women. Did I miss something?
Ray Thomas
*********************
******************************************************
Please note that if you press the 'Reply' button your
message will go only to the sender of this message.
If you want to reply to the whole list, use your mailer's
'Reply-to-All' button to send your message automatically
to [log in to unmask]
*******************************************************
|