> >
> > was for something stronger than rdfs:seeAlso which did mean "you need
> > this as well", but I don't know if that term exists.
> >
> > Well, actually, yes, we could use dcterms:requires?
>
> I guess we would need to be willing to suppose that an
> application understands the "dcterms:requires" to refer to
> a DCMI-specific convention for merging a "central schema"
> with the external "annotations".
>
> If no generalized solution to this problem has emerged,
> setting an example and planting a stake in this regard would
> seem preferable to going down the road of copying redundant
> information around everywhere.
>
In OWL one has an "import" - seems this would fit rather perfectly
here.
rs
> Tom
>
> --
> Dr. Thomas Baker [log in to unmask]
> Institutszentrum Schloss Birlinghoven mobile +49-160-9664-2129
> Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft work +49-30-8109-9027
> 53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany fax +49-2241-144-2352
> Personal email: [log in to unmask]
>
>
|