 |
 |
> > > > was for something stronger than rdfs:seeAlso which did mean "you need > > this as well", but I don't know if that term exists. > > > > Well, actually, yes, we could use dcterms:requires? > > I guess we would need to be willing to suppose that an > application understands the "dcterms:requires" to refer to > a DCMI-specific convention for merging a "central schema" > with the external "annotations". > > If no generalized solution to this problem has emerged, > setting an example and planting a stake in this regard would > seem preferable to going down the road of copying redundant > information around everywhere. > In OWL one has an "import" - seems this would fit rather perfectly here. rs > Tom > > -- > Dr. Thomas Baker [log in to unmask] > Institutszentrum Schloss Birlinghoven mobile +49-160-9664-2129 > Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft work +49-30-8109-9027 > 53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany fax +49-2241-144-2352 > Personal email: [log in to unmask] > >