On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Owen Maroney wrote:
> Also for EDG 1.x, a site has been required to have an SE and a CE. For
> EDG 2 there are a number of additional nodes, such as NM (Network
> Monitor) and MON (RGMA server?). Which, if any, of these, are required
> at every site?
Hi Owen,
A full site by default is presently is LCFGng, CE, WNs , SE, NM and MON box.
The MON box can easily be shifted to the CE for a small site but there is
some work to do there to maintain that with upgrades of course.
Generally the LCFGng config is a lot better in that all the profiles
are lot more modular so mixing things around is simpler.
Steve
>
> Owen.
>
> Stephen Burke wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Owen Maroney wrote:
> >
> >>The core sites (RAL, CERN, NIKHEF etc.) will presumably go to EDG 2
> >>asap, with other sites joining them as and when they are able. Does
> >>this imply that there will be an overlap period of EDG 1.4 and EDG 2
> >>testbeds, or will the EDG 1.4 testbed simply be 'switched off', with
> >>sites only able to rejoin when they have upgraded?
> >
> >
> > The official statement seems to be that support for the 1.4 testbed
> > ends on Sunday. Presumably individual sites will decide for themselves
> > what to do, but once at least one core service vanishes it won't be
> > useable.
> >
> > This is not a simple upgrade, either for sysadmins or users, so it's
> > likely that it will take some time to bed down.
> >
> > Stephen
>
>
> --
> #########################################
> Dr O J E Maroney [log in to unmask]
> Research Associate in eScience
> HH Wills Physics Laboratory
> University of Bristol
> Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1TL
>
> Tel. 0117 928 8769
>
--
Steve Traylen
[log in to unmask]
http://www.gridpp.ac.uk/
|