I say again, this radiology registrar was a consultant.
JP

>>> John Ryan 06/26/03 10:04pm >>>
The issue of 'stubborn', 'difficult', whatever you want to call them
radiology registrars is clearly a pervasive problem. But surely it is for us
to provide solutions to why it happens not look for reactive solutions to
when it happens.  Why does this keep happening ?  Surely we are not that
naieve as a specialty to think that when we convince today's radiology
registrar that we are clinicians, or know better, or whatever it is we want
to convince them that when they change over jobs then next year's lot will
never have the same attitude again ?.  But they do.  And they will. Just
like the surgical trainees will still use Pethidine, will want to be called
early but won't respond because they are in thatre etc etc, we all know the
lines.

The challenege for us as a specialty is surely not to react to today's
perceived egotistical trip by radiology juniors but to spend our time
looking at why it is we receive such a response.  Surely these are nice
people and not genetically linked to be difficult as with some other
specialties !  lets give them the benefit of the doubt and engage them  I
think none of us have the same problems with consultant colleagues as we or
our juniors have with Radiology registrars.  This is because we are in
closer dialogue with consultant colleagues and understand and respect each
other' s fields better.  I believe we need to spend our time encouraging our
registrars to liaise directly with the radiology registrars to draw up
evidence based guidelines on when people are justified having advanced
imaging.  Sure this won't provide the panacea but in our experience it sure
helps.

I can recoomnd a reading of the diatribe of responses from radiologists to a
particular BMJ filler last year. It does give some insight into how they
think and the pressures they are under:
.
http://bmj.com/cgi/eletters/325/7368/831#26283 

John Ryan



----- Original Message -----
From: "Doc Holiday" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 02:08
Subject: Re: Are we Clinicians?


> I have been in some serious doodoos before for writing about this subject
in
> the press. I had exceeded the limits of good tastes in making comments
> implying that "it takes a clinician to identify another" to explain why
> radiologists ask these stupid questions.
>
> I have grown up (a tiny bit). I no longer even get angry when this
happens.
> When they lose contact with patients, many radiogists lose contact with
the
> whole world of medicine as a whole. Some of them last saw daylight
(outside
> the viewing room) when A&E did not yet exist as a specialty... Did someone
> say "dinosaur"? So, Simon, it is not YOU who is out of touch with
reality...
>
> I have seen these situations diffused in many ways (although never through
> an "incident form"). One of the best solutions recently thrust into our
> hands are the government targets:
> 1. Radiologist demands "clinician" see patient before CT.
> 2. ED doc says "thanks. I'll get back to you."
> 3. ED doc calls up one of those recently materialised manager-types whose
> life seems nowadays to revolve around the 3h59m target. Tells him/her that
> patient could be discharged if CT normal or prepped for respective
admission
> if not. Patient will be "on the clock" waiting for a "clinician".
> 4. Management-type makes radiologist understand... (yes, they DO have
their
> uses)
>
> Phil, last time I was asked whether medics have agreed to do a LP if CT is
> normal, I explained to the radiologist that the medical SHO on duty had
just
> recently been my SHO and that he would love to practise this skill, which
I
> taught him, but he needed my to OK it first, since this was MY patient and
I
> would not OK it without a CT. It is also easy to just say "hold on" and
pass
> the phone to one of the A&E SHOs who can then say he IS the medic on
call...
> They really appreciate the laugh when you do that. Once, I got a medical
> student to say it...
>
> A really good one is when a radiologist comments about what a waste of
time
> it is to CT a person with neurological deficit who is XX years old (same
for
> DNAR orders or any other procedure for which ageism is proposed as a
> gate-keeper). My favourite reply is something along the lines of "sorry, I
> haven't checked this for a while. What IS the age limit nowadays?"
>
> But once I was witness to the funniest "clinician" request episode.
> 1. SHO and consultant involved in case of young-ish man with severe
> headache. Teaching session ends with all satisfied that CT indication is a
> no-brainer in this case.
> 2. Consultant calls radiology registrar but identifies self as "Dr. X in
> A&E" (I don't think radiologist realises this is a consultant).
> 3. Consultant looks up from phone in disbelief and says, "she wants me to
> approve this with a clinician..."
> 4. I jokingly point out the medic in call writing notes next to me.
> 5. Consultant, loud enough for radiologist to hear over phone, calls over
> the medic to "tell her he wants a CT"
> 6. Medic comes to the phone and says, literally, "please do a CT". I'm not
> kidding - that's what he said.
> 7. Medic listens some and then hands phone back to consultant. "I know he
> has not seen the patient. Neither have you. That's why I (emphasis here)
> made the decision to have a CT done." The tone of voice now is not angry,
> but is the one which, if you have any insight, tells you to curl up in a
> ball and humbly submit... No such luck. Conversation continues. Consultant
> at some stage DOES mention he is a consultant - it makes no difference -
> radiologist wants medic to look at patient and request CT.
> 8. Still polite and good-natured, although obviously disappointed,
> consultant gives up. Calls radiology consultant on call. Problem sorted.
> Radiology consultant contacts radiographer and she does the scan (it's NAD
> and so is the LP later). Consultant is present in CT while scan is done,
> reads own CT then radiographer calls radiologist to come down and report
it
> anyway.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> From: Dr P Munro <[log in to unmask]>
>
> This is very depressing bur all too familiar. What we have managed to
agree
> with our radiologists is that we use the SIGN head injury criteria for
> trauma scans and for non-trauma we will scan
> (www.sign.ac.uk)
> and for non-trauma we will scan:
> coma ?cause
> clinical SAH with altered LOC, focal signs or persistant vomiting.
> Using these we have aa audited pick up rate of about 30% for trauma and
20%
> for non-trauma abnormal scans.
> The last time I was faced with an SAH problem like the one described I
> pointed out to the radiologists:
> "I am genuinely worried this person has a subarachnoid haemorrhage - if
they
> dont, then we don't need to worry much, if they do they have a 25% chance
of
> being dead in the next 24 hrs and I would transfer them to our
neurosurgery
> unit tonight if the diagnosis confirmed"
>
> Other points - a negative scan is not some kind of defeat, it is a win-win
> situation - we do not have to take any other immediate action and the
> patient doesn't have a life-threatening condition. Hoorah! Also a negative
> scan in someone GCS3 with fixed pupils mandates continuing intensive care
> until other diagnoses are excluded (TCA OD is the most common one).
>
> Before anyone says I have not forgotten about LP in suspected SAH with a
> normal scan. This is also a common ploy to dissuade us from scanning
> someone.
> Radiologist "Is this patient going to have an LP if the scan is normal"
> Me "yes - WHAT'S YOUR POINT?"
>
> In short- yes, you are a clinician and they are not. Offer to swap.
>
> Phil Munro
> A&E Glasgow
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[log in to unmask]>
>
> >I've just had the most staggering conversation with a radiologist.  I was
> requesting an urgent CT scan on a young patient with acute onset of
> headache, left sided hemiplegia and a history of previous SAH secondary to
> an AVM.  The radiologist smiled and said:
>  >
>  > "Has this lady been seen by a clinician yet?"
>  >
>  > When I suggested that I was the clinician dealing with this patient
(and
> to imply I was not a clinician was somewhat insulting) he refused to
accept
> my standing and insisted that she be seen by "a clinician".
>  >
>  > It would appear that five years of general training, five years of
> specialist training, three postgraduate exams and a consultant job in
> waiting is not enough to be classed as a clinician.
>  >
>  > Besides this general insult was the opinion that a CT for a ?sub
> arachnoid
> was urgent and not an emergency as it would make no difference to the
> immediate outcome.  Now within reason I can just about understand this.  I
> don't request CT scans at 5am for 95 year olds with acute hemiplegias but
at
> 16.35 for a lady in her 30s?
>  >
>  > Am I completely out of touch with reality?
>  >
>  > Dr Simon McCormick
>  > SpR Emergency Medicine (on of the last clinical specialties left)
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Tired of 56k? Get a FREE BT Broadband connection
> http://www.msn.co.uk/specials/btbroadband 
>