Hi,
On Wed, 14 May 2003, Philip TAYLOR [PC336/H-XP] wrote:
> Good idea. The hackles on the back of my neck always
> start to rise when someone re-starts the "proprietary=bad/
> free-software=good" war<-<-<-debate. If a private company
> have come up with a good idea that works, let's negotiate
> a deal that benefits all, not re-invent the wheel just for
> doctrinal reasons.
The question really comes down to what benefits all, I guess. This isn't a
doctrinal argument but a pragmatic one.
If it costs each institution 1000 to use the software, or maybe a "group
discount" brings the total cost down to 50,000/year, is it right to spend
that? Is it right to spend that if it costs 30,000 to develop your own
version, which can thereafter be made available freely?
Would you get a better product if textHELP Systems made the source code
for browsealoud available to all (allowing anyone to go in and make
bugfixes, add features), but asked that you pay for their
packaged/supported bundle? Do you really want to install a plugin on your
desktop without knowing what's in it or how it works?
Of course, lots of companies refuse to open their software, and we end up
buying it anyway. But a bit of gentle pressure on them never hurt anyone.
That said, wow! I just installed the software, and it's pretty impressive!
Andrew.
--
Andrew Savory Email: [log in to unmask]
Managing Director Tel: +44 (0)870 741 6658
Luminas Internet Applications Fax: +44 (0)700 598 1135
This is not an official statement or order. Web: www.luminas.co.uk
|