JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MINING-HISTORY Archives


MINING-HISTORY Archives

MINING-HISTORY Archives


mining-history@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MINING-HISTORY Home

MINING-HISTORY Home

MINING-HISTORY  2003

MINING-HISTORY 2003

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Crazing Mills

From:

Peter Claughton <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

The mining-history list.

Date:

Mon, 3 Nov 2003 12:48:46 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (94 lines)

> In true lead mining this shift appears to correlate with the introduction
of roller crushing mills at the very end of the 18th century.  In the 13th
century, therefore, they were presumably using hammers and/or stamps before
getting a product small enough to treat in a crazing mill.  There would also
(presumably) be intermediate sorting processes, using sieves and/or buddles.

Mike,

In the late 13th/ early 14th century Devon mines they do not appear to have
been using crazing mills in the processing of silver-bearing ores -
certainly there is no documentary evidence and, as no archaeological
investigations have yet been carried out, there is no field evidence. What
archaeological evidence we do have is for Lyonaise mines in the mid 15th
century. But the documentary evidence in Devon points to a situation where
the crazing mill or stamps might have been beneficial to the process.
Bucking hammers and edge wheels for crushing (although the latter were
confined to crushing smelting residues), sieves and washing places, i.e.
buddling sites, are documented, and the smelting technique used points to
the processing of crushed ore, which leads into your second point -

>> The use of furnace smelting with higher temperatures and a reducing
atmosphere >Galena is a sulphide and needs to be at least partly oxidised
before it can be smelted.  Could this be done in the furnaces you refer too?

The use of the bellows blown, charcoal fired furnace would certainly result
in the loss of some lead through volatilisation but that was acceptable when
the object of the process was the silver. When, in the 15th century, all the
ore from the Devon mines was smelted in water powered furnaces then
preliminary roasting is documented but, with a combination of bole and
furnace in use, there was always partially oxidised residues from the former
to add to the furnace charge. In fact the delay of three years, between the
opening of the Devon mines and 1295, in introducing furnace smelting might
be put down to a need to accumulate 'blackwork' residues to initiate the
reaction in the furnace.

We should look at innovations in ore processing (preparation and smelting)
in terms of resource depletion. Development of roller crushing mills, ore
hearth smelting, the flotation process; they can all be explained as moves
to make more of the available resources.

As I said in an earlier message, the mining of silver-bearing ores reach
that crisis at an earlier stage than non-argentiferous lead mining. However,
and again I've probably mentioned this before, the ore hearth appears to
have been born of resource depletion in the English non-argentiferous sector
on Mendip and quickly spread to other mining fields in the late 16th
century. But the appearance of the 'blackwork furnace', for treating
smelting residues, in Co. Durham in the 15th century and the presence of
'lead ore sand', i.e. crushed galena, amongst the assets listed in some
early 16th century Swaledale (Yorkshire) wills suggest that position had
been reached long before the introduction of the ore hearth.

But to return to your specific points -

I have no specific detail on the ores in the Devon silver mines of the late
13th /early 14th century, although both galena and cerussite were worked,
but the techniques documented suggest they were mixed with significant
amounts of gangue material.

As to the archaeology, that is the next stage in investigating the Devon
mines - my own work has identified many aspects of mining which cannot not
be satisfactorily explained by the surviving documentation plus some
physical features which supported the documentary evidence but require
further investigation.

As to bashing the French and Spanish - primarily the latter from the 16th c.
onwards, before that they were in the same position as the English, trying
to extract the last ounce of silver from indigenous resources or relying on
central European production. Suprisingly, however, robbing others of their
monetary resources was not the panacea it might seem - the most productive
phase of English / Welsh silver production since the 12th century came in
the late 16th and early 17th centuries!

This is certainly a discussion which can be expanded beyond the medieval
period, non-ferrous metal mining and the UK.

Peter

______________________________________________

Dr Peter Claughton,
Blaenpant Morfil, nr. Rosebush, Clynderwen, Pembrokeshire, Wales  SA66 7RE.
Tel. 01437 532578; Fax. 01437 532921; Mobile 07831 427599

University of Exeter - School of Historical, Political and Sociological Studies
(Centre for South Western Historical Studies)
E-mail:  [log in to unmask]

Co-owner - mining-history e-mail discussion list.
See http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/files/mining-history/  for details.

Mining History Pages - http://www.exeter.ac.uk/~pfclaugh/mhinf/

_____________________________________________

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
October 2022
September 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager