JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for FILM-PHILOSOPHY Archives


FILM-PHILOSOPHY Archives

FILM-PHILOSOPHY Archives


FILM-PHILOSOPHY@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

FILM-PHILOSOPHY Home

FILM-PHILOSOPHY Home

FILM-PHILOSOPHY  2003

FILM-PHILOSOPHY 2003

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Kubrick's cinematic concepts

From:

Ross Macleay <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Film-Philosophy Salon <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 27 Mar 2003 16:41:10 +1100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (77 lines)

Vice,

Your question was: 'Does anyone have any idea what a cinematic concept might
be, and do you think this notion is inevitably related to auteur theory, or
does it stand on its own in terms of being a bridge between film and
philosophical discourse in a more interdisciplinary perspective?'

I would prefer to use something like the latter of these two meanings. I am
not so sure though that it is a matter of an interdisciplinary perspective
so much as a technical term that is useful for discussing the way film
signifies. Such a term would belong to the cinematic equivalent of
philosophy of language or logic or semiotic or linguistics. On the other
hand I would think of auteur theory as a matter of stylistics, or rhetoric
or poetics.

Although I would think that the term 'cinematic concept' could be used in
several ways, I find it is useful to use it as a term of film 'grammar', ie
in the sense that any film is made up of cinematic concepts, just as any
narrative or argument is made up of concepts (cinematic, linguistic, or
whatever). (Grammar is not quite the right word here. Perhaps cinematics?)

Cinematics, stylistics, etc are all grist for film philosophy.

Some time ago, in the context of discussing the use of dolly counter-zoom
shots , Robert Koehler posted the following about the use of the zoom in
Barry Lyndon:

> The shot I referred to in ``Barry Lyndon'' is actually a repeated
> motif throughout the film, devised by Kubrick and his dp, the late John
> Alcott. It was a very slow, sometimes almost imperceptible pull-back zoom
> from a long focal length position to a wide shot. There was no use of the
> tracking camera in these shots; the camera remained stationary. The shot
is
> used so often in the film that it could only be counted by keeping a
running
> tally, but watch the film and you'll see it right away. I mentioned it
> because the zoom lens had become so popular and overused that it was
pretty
> much ``retired'' as a tool by 1975. Kubrick and Alcott came up with an
> entirely fresh way of using the zoom lens, however; with this new method,
> Kubrick could begin a shot by zeroing in on a character or characters, and
> then gradually reveal them in their place in society or nature, depending
on
> the location. It was also as if Kubrick had taken a Constable painting,
> forced us to look at the detail of tiny characters that are otherwise
> dwarfed by the landscape, and then pulled us back to see the rest of the
> painting around the detail. The sociological, ecological and psychological
> dimensions of this kind of zoom shot were considerable in the context of
> individual shots, and grew even richer with meaning as these shots
> multiplied over the course of the film--as we could mentally compare
earlier
> zoom shots of Barry in his humble Irish background with Barry in his
later,
> absurdly lavish lifestyle, or the petty egotism of a self-inflated
> character, then reduced to their proper ant-sized worth by the enormous
> spread of nature around them. (What's interesting is how Michael Hordern's
> voice-over third-person narration never underlines the meaning of these
> shots, but instead provides another context, some historical background or
> personal data, often taken from Thackerey's novel.) The zoom has rarely
been
> used to this effect, and almost never so well.
> Robert Koehler

This says something about Kubrick as auteur, insofar as it is about a
distinctive cinematic style (call it Kubrick's style if you like - &
Alcott's), but as Robert has described these shots, they, like all shots,
work as image concepts. These in particular start with the disclosure of
certain details and then reveal more about their original subjects by
showing their context. (To call these shots 'slow zoom out reveals' would be
analogous to the way the old works on rhetoric coined terms for what they
considered to be the main types of figures of speech.) Each shot is a
temporal exposition of a complex concept. But then again, any shot is a
temporal exposition of a concept. A cinematic concept. And, in fact, a
string of shots is also a compound cinematic concept.

Ross

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager