in terms of rhythm and time they are similar but i would disagee that
music is time based. its aural as oppossed to visual. Although I find
beauty in their synthesis which i think is based on the meeting of their
rhythmic/time/movement components. I dont think they would necessarily
ever completely merge though. But, id be interested in hearing the
conditions of a merger. maybe they re able to successfully cross over.
would a band performing along with projections be considered an example
of a merger?
James
---------Included Message----------
>Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 06:51:12 GMT
>From: "Mark O'Connell" <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: "Film-Philosophy Salon" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 4 Mar 2003 to 5 Mar 2003 -
Special issue (#2003-60)
>
>> music is a lanuage separate of
>>the cinema
>
>not so sure about that.... rhythm, time, etc.... They're both time
based
>media, they both depend on the same dynamics, they seem to me to be
merging
>together. Cinema isn't simply narrative, and like that...
>
>Mark O'Connell
>[log in to unmask]
>www.markoconnell.org
>
>
---------End of Included Message----------
|