> > "Amelie" was shot on film (35mm) but with an entirely digital
intermediate
> > process (like "O Brother.." & "City of God" or the latest Hobbits)
> >
> > -Sam Wells
>
> So that makes it "not-digital"? I don't think so. I suppose it depends on
> how one interprets 'made in France using digital technology'. I think
> post-production counts.
However, it does raise an interesting ontological point of order.
>
I meant the use of digital technology at any stage in the process. However
this is an interesting (and probably important) issue.
I am wondering now how and when to distinguish between these different uses
of the the digital - does it really matter that at some point photography
took place, if it is converted into digital code afterwards anyway?
|