Aaron writes:
> It's not clear why we need to defend horror on any basis besides the
> experience it provides, though it can certainly be defended on other
> grounds. An effective horror film seems justification enough.
>
> Andrew starts several arguments against horror in his post, but none of
> them promise to be any good.
Talk about tautological arguments. Really. Why even bother making a point?
Aaron's facile dismissal might perhaps be indicative of the very points I was
indeed making; mere observation on his behalf is simply lazy.
Andrew
|