Dan Nagle wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:44:27 -0600, James Giles
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Aleksandar Donev wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>>> Sorry, that can't be done due to legacy codes
>>
>> Neither can some standard conforming form of FLUSH. And if the
>> code can be recompiled, the new rule can be applied. If the code
>> has an old form of FLUSH, it will have to be changed anyway.
>
> <snip>
>
> Flush was designed so a simple editing change, to wit
>
> call flush( iunit) --> flush( iunit)
>
> would produce a legal flush statement. Looks to be a task for sed.
And, with my suggested change, the conversion would be:
call flush -->
Nothing.
--
J. Giles
|