JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN Archives


ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN Archives

ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN Archives


ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN Home

ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN Home

ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN  2003

ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN 2003

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Haemoglobin variants in HbA1c samples

From:

Eric Kilpatrick <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Eric Kilpatrick <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 25 Jun 2003 23:32:49 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (107 lines)

This is certainly a difficult one. I go along with Chris' view about us
being asked for a consult on the sample and of doing 'whatever is reasonable
to answer the question put to us'. I certainly have no qualms about adding
on tests which are of relevance to the condition being investigated (adding
thyroid antibodies onto a TFT is an example), but if the request is to
assess glycaemic control, then the question did not ask us to test for the
completely unrelated condition of haemoglobinopathy. It just so happens that
our best test of glycaemic control involves haemoglobin, but I am sure the
patient with diabetes does not realise that!

Interestingly, yesterday our haematologist did not have a problem about
adding on Hb electrophoresis either. Having slept on it, he is now not so
keen!

Eric
----- Original Message -----
From: Chris Florkowski <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 10:26 PM
Subject: Haemoglobin variants in HbA1c samples


Our haematologists have never had a problem test-adding Hb
electrophoresis - the question of a "genetic test" has not arisen in
this context.  The ultimate arbiter is mass spectrometry, in our domain
and under our jurisdiction.  To answer Eric's specific point, we take
the view that any request that crosses our threshold is a consultation
and we will do (test-add) whatever is reasonable to answer the question
put to us.  We turned up one especially interesting Hb variant this way
(vide infra for precis), for which we did get permission from the
patient to publish the findings.

Chris Florkowski; Christchurch, NZ

C M Florkowski, T A Walmsley, S O Brennan and P M George
Haemoglobin Marseille-Long Island and interpretation of HbA1c: which
HbA1c result is the "right answer"?

Postgraduate Med J (2003) 79:174-175

An asymptomatic 44 year old woman was screened for diabetes.  Initial
HbA1c analysis by HPLC (Bio Rad Variant) gave a result of 45%,
considered  biologically implausible. Immunoassay (DCA 2000) was 2.8%,
also considered implausible. Affinity chromatography (Primus
Corporation, Kansas City, MO, USA) gave 4.6%. Mass spectrometry (VG
Platform; Micromass, UK) confirmed the presence of Hb Marseille-Long
Island (methionyl extension of the amino terminus of the ß globin chain
and  histidine to proline substitution at position 2 in the ß chain)
This substitution of a positively charged amino acid with a neutral one
results in a net loss of one positive charge. It thus has lower affinity
for the ion exchange resin and coelutes with the HbA1c peak resulting in
an artefactually high reading.

The ß globin chains from Hb Marseille-Long Island have an amino
terminal that is modified in a way that does not permit recognition by
the antibodies of the DCA 2000 assay. Given that the subject is
heterozygous for this variant and that half the ß chains are therefore
normal, then arguably the "correct" answer might be obtained by doubling
the DCA 2000 result. This would give a value of 5.8%, which is
plausible.






**********************************************************************
** This email and attachments have been scanned for content and viruses
and is believed to be clean **
This email or attachments may contain confidential or legally
privileged information intended for the sole use of the addressee(s).
Any use, redistribution, disclosure, or reproduction of this message,
except as intended, is prohibited. If you received this email in error,
please notify the sender and remove all copies of the message,
including any attachments. Any views or opinions expressed in this
email (unless otherwise stated) may not represent those of Canterbury
District Health Board
**********************************************************************

------ACB discussion List Information--------
This is an open discussion list for the academic and clinical
community working in clinical biochemistry.
Please note, archived messages are public and can be viewed
via the internet. Views expressed are those of the individual and
they are responsible for all message content.

ACB Web Site
http://www.acb.org.uk
List Archives
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html
List Instructions (How to leave etc.)
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/

------ACB discussion List Information--------
This is an open discussion list for the academic and clinical
community working in clinical biochemistry.
Please note, archived messages are public and can be viewed
via the internet. Views expressed are those of the individual and
they are responsible for all message content.

ACB Web Site
http://www.acb.org.uk
List Archives
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html
List Instructions (How to leave etc.)
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager