Dear Richard
I would appreciate the excel file
Many thanks
Aubrey
SR> Sorry the format of my first email was
SR> completely screwed up: if anybody has
SR> some bright ideas for sending tables etc,
SR> I will have another go. Meanwhile, if you are
SR> interested, I could send the
SR> Word and Excel files directly to you.
SR> Our criteria include:
SR> for 100uL: accuracy 99.3 - 100.7 uL, precision: SD < 0.5 uL
SR> For 1000 uL: 994 - 1006 uL, precision: SD < 5.0 uL
SR> Richard Scarff
SR> Biochem,Royal Perth Hospital
SR> Western Australia
SR> -----Original Message-----
SR> From: Galloway, Peter
SR> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
SR> Sent: Friday, 14 November 2003 07:43
SR> To: [log in to unmask]
SR> Subject: Re: Pipette checks
SR> Please help me with my ignorance.
SR> Is there a sensible regime for pipette checks
SR> in terms of the frequency of
SR> checks and the required accuracy.
SR> All I can find is a German standard DIN 12650
SR> which suggests 3 monthly
SR> checks and an error limit of 1.5 ul at 100ul and 10ul at 1000ul
SR> This seems a lot of work. Is there a more
SR> reasonable standard which would be
SR> acceptable to the majority ?
SR> Peter Galloway
SR> Royal Hospital for Sick Children
SR> Glasgow
SR> **********************************************************************
SR> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
SR> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
SR> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
SR> the system manager.
SR> This footnote also confirms that this email
SR> message has been swept by
SR> MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
SR> www.mimesweeper.com
SR> **********************************************************************
SR> ------ACB discussion List Information--------
SR> This is an open discussion
SR> list for the academic and clinical community working in clinical
SR> biochemistry. Please note, archived messages
SR> are public and can be viewed
SR> via the internet. Views expressed are those of
SR> the individual and they are
SR> responsible for all message content.
SR> ACB Web Site http://www.acb.org.uk List Archives
SR> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html List Instructions
SR> (How to leave etc.) http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/
SR> ------ACB discussion List
SR> Information-------- This is an open discussion
SR> list for the academic and
SR> clinical community working in clinical
SR> biochemistry. Please note, archived
SR> messages are public and can be viewed via the
SR> internet. Views expressed are
SR> those of the individual and they are
SR> responsible for all message content.
SR> ACB Web Site http://www.acb.org.uk List Archives
SR> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html List Instructions
SR> (How to leave etc.) http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/
SR> ------ACB discussion List Information--------
SR> This is an open discussion list for the academic and clinical
SR> community working in clinical biochemistry.
SR> Please note, archived messages are public and can be viewed
SR> via the internet. Views expressed are those of the individual and
SR> they are responsible for all message content.
SR> ACB Web Site
SR> http://www.acb.org.uk
SR> List Archives
SR> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html
SR> List Instructions (How to leave etc.)
SR> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/
Regards
Aubrey Blumsohn
------ACB discussion List Information--------
This is an open discussion list for the academic and clinical
community working in clinical biochemistry.
Please note, archived messages are public and can be viewed
via the internet. Views expressed are those of the individual and
they are responsible for all message content.
ACB Web Site
http://www.acb.org.uk
List Archives
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html
List Instructions (How to leave etc.)
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/
|