JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN Archives


ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN Archives

ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN Archives


ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN Home

ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN Home

ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN  2003

ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN 2003

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: sensitive CRP and CHD

From:

David Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

David Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 21 Jan 2003 13:12:06 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (239 lines)

 Just a bit more (useless or otherwise)information.
I visited a hospital in Valencia, Spain, this morning
and their Immunology Dept. offer CRP (acute) and
hs-CRP (prognostic). I remarked that this was a
coincidence as it's value was being discussed by this
group, and was told by the Medical Specialist (a
clinical biochemist with a medical degree), "there is
sufficient evidence to provide it as a prognostic
test". I don't how they operate their budget....is any
lab in the UK being asked to offer it?



--- Gray Malcolm
<[log in to unmask]> wrote: >  In
this morning's London Times newspaper, there was
> an article on CRP and
> cardiac risk based on a paper due to be published
> this week in the journal
> CIRCULATION. Perhaps the answer as to how useful CRP
> would be in evaluating
> cardiovascular risk, with other factors already
> understood, will be there
> (but I doubt it). Expect a flood of new requests!
>
> Malcolm Gray
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Campbell
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: 20/1/2003 11:16 PM
> Subject: Re: sensitive CRP and CHD
>
> Sensitive CRP assays can only discriminate between
> those with and
> without
> active atherosclerosis when there are couple of
> hundred subjects in each
> group.  Sensitive CRP measurements can't confidently
> discriminate
> between
> individuals.  Our calculations indicate that the
> number of samples
> required
> from an individual to obtain a clinically useful
> estimate of their true
> hs-CRP concentration lies between 10 and 50.  See
> our Ann Clin Biochem
> paper referenced below and the other articles as
> well which give more
> reasons why hs-CRP is not clinically useful.
>
> Ridker has suggested that we could just do a number
> of measurements over
> time and pick the lowest value.  However there are a
> number of untested
> assumptions inherent in this idea that would need to
> be validated.  The
> experiments required to identify and quantify the
> factors which
> contribute
> to both minor and major variation in plasma CRP
> concentrations are not
> going to be easy to perform.  We are setting up a
> study to follow
> subjects
> over time while they record a health diary to see
> whether clinically
> significant intra-individual variations in hs-CRP
> are subjectively or
> objectively identifiable.  It is our hypothesis that
> many such
> variations
> will be silent.
>
> Campbell B et al.  Limited clinical utility of
> high-sensitivity plasma
> C-reactive protein assays.  Ann Clin Biochem
> 2002;39:85-88
> Kushner I. C-reactive protein and atherosclerosis.
> Science
> 2002;297:520-21
> Kushner I, Sehgal AR. Is high-sensitivity C-reactive
> protein an
> effective
> screening test for cardiovascular risk? Arch Int Med
> 2002;162:867-9
> Levinson SS, Elin RJ. What is C-reactive protein
> telling us about
> coronary
> artery disease? Arch Int Med 2002;162:389-95
>
> Bruce Campbell
>
> ****************************************
> Bruce Campbell  FRCPA  FAACB
> Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology
> Ph 61 (0)7 3377 8672
> Fax 61 (0)7 3870 5989
> Email [log in to unmask]
> ****************************************
>
>
>
>                     Craig Webster
>                     <[log in to unmask]>
> To:
> [log in to unmask]
>                     Sent by: clinical
> cc:
>                     biochemistry discussion
> Subject:     Re:
> sensitive CRP and CHD
>                     list
>                     <ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN@JISCM
>                     AIL.AC.UK>
>
>
>                     21/01/03 04:28
>                     Please respond to Craig
>                     Webster
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Sensitive CRP was mentioned in a Plenary Lecture by
> Matt McQueen at the
> ICCC
> kyoto. Within individual variation data suggests
> that up to 5
> measurements
> of sensitive CRP may be neccessary to obtain a value
> that can be used in
> the
> assessment of CHD risk. WHich is probably even
> better news for
> manufacturers!
>
> The theory that atherlosclerosis is a chronic low
> grade inflammatory
> reaction underpins its measurement.
>
> I always thought that CRP was probably under
> requested in the past due
> to
> long turn around times etc. Now that we can turn the
> test around quickly
> surely we are seeing the benefits of all our
> execellent work on
> improving
> the service we provide :-)
>
> Craig Webster
> Principal Clinical Biochemist
> Nottingham City Hospital
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: clinical biochemistry discussion list
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf
> Of David Brown
> Sent: 20 January 2003 17:25
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN] sensitive CRP and
> CHD
>
>
> Like everything else, apparently, new "sensitive"
> CRP
> is the same non specific CRP we have been measuring
> for years, only it is more sensitive in the lower
> range. There is sufficient interest in this assay as
> a
> cardiac risk factor, that there is more than one
> assay
> method on the market. My experience of assaying
> CRP's
> consisted of seeing - most below measurable range -
> and the rest so sky high, that I wondered if the
> test
> was really necessary (but that was a few years ago).
> Now I may be led to believe that it is as valuable
> as
> measuring a total cholesterol. There are several
> major
> studies indicating this. For those who are
> interested,this web page explains sensitive CRP
> (from
> a manufacturers point of view) and gives some
> references too.
>
> http://www.sonoraquest.com/documents/CardioCRP.pdf
>
>
> Best wishes
>
> David Brown
>
>  --- "Mainwaring-Burton Richard (RGZ)"
> <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote: > In the light of the significant numbers of
> raised
> > (non-sensitive) CRPs we
> > report for a plethora of reasons, how do we pick
> out
> > the significant
> > elevations of sensitive CRP ?
> >
> > Suggested stratigies :
> > 1.      do a low sensitivity assay first
> > 2.      apologise to potential CHD patients with
> > high CRP - test no good
> > until arthritis/crohns/flu/etc cleared up
> > 3.      wait for the cardio-specific version ?
> >
>
=== message truncated ===

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com

------ACB discussion List Information--------
This is an open discussion list for the academic and clinical
community working in clinical biochemistry.
Please note, archived messages are public and can be viewed
via the internet. Views expressed are those of the individual and
they are responsible for all message content.

ACB Web Site
http://www.acb.org.uk
List Archives
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html
List Instructions (How to leave etc.)
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager