But that introduces another, different issue: the value of the
"clinical details" information IN THE LABORATORY.
Could someone from Leeds post an update on the work on barcoded entry
of clinical details...
Jonathan
On Monday, Mar 10, 2003, at 14:43 Europe/London, Corns, Cathryn wrote:
> This is a difficult issue. In my last laboratory, at a time of
> desperate staff shortage we stopped putting in the clinical details
> and received a lot of flack from some of the requesters, and were
> forced to continue to enter the data. In fact, about 10-15% were
> reported as 'illegible' - although I could generally read them, the
> data entry staff with limited experience could not. Here, at
> Southend, we transcribe (with varying efficiency) the clinical details
> on the GP requests, but not the hospital ones; this was in response to
> pressure from GP Fundholders. We have tried training data entry
> staff, but with the high turnover this is worse than trying to paint
> the Forth Bridge, and actually has little impact.
>
> We are just about to go over to the WWA computer system and will be
> introducing form scanning, with a range of boxes to pre-code some
> common clinical details, which will be read and reported on all the
> reports. However, I'm not sure how good this is going to be - so far
> we have intensively trained users on one hospital ward how to complete
> the form and only a small fraction are being properly completed!
>
> There is no doubt that the clinical info on the report does jog the
> mind of the requester (especially if it is a GP or out-patient, where
> the report may not be seen for a few days after the request was made)
> but the quality of what we enter is pretty awful (and occasionally
> hilarious)
>
> Cathryn Corns
> Head of Biochemistry
> Southend Hospital
> 01702 435555 ext 4058
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paulette Cusick [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 10 March 2003 12:03
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: clinical details on reports
>
>
> In an ideal world the biochemistry reports leaving the laboratory
> should
> contain the clinical details provided on the request form. With high
> turnover of the staff group inputting request forms into the lab
> computer
> and a growing workload, the quality of the clinical details input by
> them
> has deteriorated to the point at which I feel the errors outweigh the
> usefulness of reporting this information back to users. We do not have
> electronic requesting or form scanning in place yet and I am not
> convinced
> that training the inputters in medical terminology will provide a
> practical
> and lasting solution (because of the high staff turnover).
> I am keen to know how many labs print clinical details received with
> the
> request on their reports. Specifically, has anyone stopped this
> practice
> and had negative feedback from their users? Did the level of clinical
> details provided by your users then fall off as a consequence? At the
> moment, my colleagues and I are divided on the way forward!
>
> Paulette Cusick
> Consultant Biochemist
> Partnership Pathology Services
> Frimley Park Hospital
>
> ------ACB discussion List Information--------
> This is an open discussion list for the academic and clinical
> community working in clinical biochemistry.
> Please note, archived messages are public and can be viewed
> via the internet. Views expressed are those of the individual and
> they are responsible for all message content.
>
> ACB Web Site
> http://www.acb.org.uk
> List Archives
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html
> List Instructions (How to leave etc.)
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
> the system manager.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
> MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
>
> www.mimesweeper.com
> **********************************************************************
>
> ------ACB discussion List Information--------
> This is an open discussion list for the academic and clinical
> community working in clinical biochemistry.
> Please note, archived messages are public and can be viewed
> via the internet. Views expressed are those of the individual and
> they are responsible for all message content.
>
> ACB Web Site
> http://www.acb.org.uk
> List Archives
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html
> List Instructions (How to leave etc.)
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/
------ACB discussion List Information--------
This is an open discussion list for the academic and clinical
community working in clinical biochemistry.
Please note, archived messages are public and can be viewed
via the internet. Views expressed are those of the individual and
they are responsible for all message content.
ACB Web Site
http://www.acb.org.uk
List Archives
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html
List Instructions (How to leave etc.)
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/
|