Maybe I'll discover later that I'm wrong, but nothing here seems
inconsistent with David's or my position for that matter. However, it
seems to me that a large part of the design research community would
find this a bit iffy. Certainly there seems to be a tendency toward a
science of design employing an old paradigm position. I'm not saying
there is anything wrong with this in principle, but do seriously wonder
whether it can yield anything that is really useful for advancing
designing. Still I don't want to open up this track.
Steve
"Chris RUST(SCS)" wrote:
> I have in the past been able to reflect usefully on ideas about creativity that
> have led me to improve my own methods of working and give a more informed
> structure to my students' experience and I'm sure that I am not alone in this.
>
--
Professor Stephen AR Scrivener
VIDE Research Centre
Design Institute
School of Art and Design
Coventry University
Coventry, CV1 5FB, UK
Tel: +44 (0)24 7688 7477
Fax: +44 (0)24 7688 7759
Mobile: +44 (0)7789 590 228
Email: [log in to unmask]
|