JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ACAD-AE-MED Archives


ACAD-AE-MED Archives

ACAD-AE-MED Archives


ACAD-AE-MED@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ACAD-AE-MED Home

ACAD-AE-MED Home

ACAD-AE-MED  October 2002

ACAD-AE-MED October 2002

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Haematoma blocks

From:

Ray McGlone <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Accident and Emergency Academic List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 1 Oct 2002 20:38:47 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (127 lines)

I'd agree that using a single cuff is painful for the patient if the cuff
release is delayed in order to get a check X ray.

When I was the volunteer in the atracurium study we only had a single cuff
available... very uncomfortable at 30 mins. I sometimes give a talk to the
radiographers and if I get the opportunity I put the cuff on one of them, so
that they understand the importance of getting a check X ray quickly!

Having said that I would routinely rotate the cuff at 15 mins after
manipulation if a check X ray was to be done. Much better for the patient.
Couldn't find a lot on double cuffs on Medline probably because papers were
done before Medline starts in the 1960's.

See below


Title

Comparison of the effect of EMLA cream, subcutaneous ring anaesthesia and a
double cuff technique in the prevention of tourniquet pain.

Source

BJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia. 70(4):394-6, 1993 Apr.



Abstract

We have examined the effect of EMLA on tourniquet pain and compared it with
those of subcutaneous ring anaesthesia (SRA), a double cuff technique and a
single cuff (control) during i.v. regional anaesthesia. The durations of
analgesia (mean 57.3 (SD 16.6) min) and tolerance (72.3 (13.9) min) to
tourniquet inflation in the EMLA group were comparable to those in the SRA
group (54.1 (16.2) min and 68.3 (19.0) min), but significantly (P < 0.05)
greater than those in the control group (30.0 (10.7) min and 45.6 (14.0)
min). The double cuff technique was the most effective method, with 91.5
(14.9) min duration of analgesia. We conclude that EMLA provided a
significant analgesic effect on tourniquet pain compared with the control
group, but a relatively limited analgesic effect compared with a double cuff
technique.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Black, John" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 12:51 PM
Subject: Haematoma blocks


> I think Paul has made the key point in the method that blocking the ulna
> aspect of the wrist (infiltrating just distal to the ulna styloid
including
> the radio-carpal joint) as well as the fracture site and WAITING 15
minutes
> or so is key the success. I use up to 2 mg/kg of 1 % lignocaine for its
> speed of action - using bupivacaine takes significantly longer. Despite
this
> once the fracture has been reduced and held in a cast, analgesia is
usually
> less of an issue.
>
> It is important that the wrist x-rays are readily available for inspection
> so that the precise position of the fracture site can be determined in the
> swollen wrist.  I use a 23 G needle followed by a 21 G needle and
infiltrate
> slowly. In elderly patients impacted fractures are rarely problematic as
the
> bones are usually osteoporotic.
>
> Despite intuition, we have NOT had any problems with infection and there
is
> nothing in the literature to support an excess of bony infection with this
> method of block. Lack of muscular relaxation has not compromised
> satisfactory reduction if satisfactory local anaesthesia has been
achieved,
> and patients can be instructed to relax if need be. I do happen to make
note
> of any verbal/non verbal clues from the patient re efficacy of the block
> throughout the procedure.
>
> The major issue I have with Bier's block is freeing up the necessary
> resources (resus room type environment) for this procedure to be safely
> performed. I have also been struck by how painful the cuff is for many
> patients when a single cuff technique is used (as has been encouraged for
> use in the ED to reduce the risk of the wrong cuff being deflated during
the
> procedure).
>
> I would be interested to know from Jason precisely what type
> instruction/method etc the doctors who performed haematoma blocks received
> in his study.
>
> John Black
> Oxford
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Ransom [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 30 September 2002 09:21
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Bier Blocks
>
>
> Given up on Bier blocks by now,  thanks to time constraints.  Haematoma
> blocks so much faster.  My experience is that failure rate in haematoma
> blocks as opposed to Biers concerns inadequate dosage of anaesthetic,  and
> most  likely omitting to inject over the ulnar side of the wrist aswell,
as
> there will usually be damage here too.  So,  two injection sites usually,
> but I can  (nearly) always get excellent anaesthesia with this site.  I
use
> marcaine,  on the basis that this is what I would want for myself.
> Sometimes,when the department is busy,  or a long wait in x-ray,  I will
put
> in the block on first sight, and give it a tweak,  and so just get back an
> x-ray in POP,  if it is clinically obvious this is a Colles.  Patients
> usually happy to be out of the department in under an hour, if lucky.
> As for the haematoma,  not always possible to get into this,  if there is
> more of an impaction.  Can't say that I've noticed any decrease in
analgesia
> since not routinely aspirating x mls of blood back.
>
> Paul Ransom
> A&E Brighton
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
September 2022
July 2022
February 2022
January 2022
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
September 2019
March 2019
April 2018
January 2018
November 2017
May 2017
March 2017
November 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
October 2014
September 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
February 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
May 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager