> From [log in to unmask] Fri Oct 18 13:12 MET 2002
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
> Importance: Normal
> Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 12:14:51 +0100
> From: Pete Johnston <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: URIs in XML encoding of DC and RSS 2.0
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> > Whatever...think we need to get an "authoritive" answer -
> > otherwise we probably will store wrong stuff in databases or
> > XSLTs to create RDF run crazy (maybe miss a necessary escape
> > algorithm or do one to much) -
>
> I agree, I can see the potential for problems. And as I'm not one of the
> people developing services built on this stuff, it's an area where I
> really don't have a good grasp of some of the detail myself.
>
> What I'm willing to do (some time in the next couple of weeks maybe) is
> to try to compile a set of examples with some of the variants, list the
> behaviour I see from some of the parsers in validating these against
> type xs:anyURI, and take it to xmlschema-dev and try to get a
> pronouncement on any variations/anomalies.
That would be great!
rs
>
> > By the way: To my great pleasure XML 1.1 will slightly extend
> > the notion "well-formed" - more fun with character escape
> > issues ahead....
>
> Now, that news has really spoiled my weekend.... ;-)
>
> > This type of questions i honestly hate.
>
> Seconded....
>
> Pete
>
>
|