On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Roland Schwaenzl wrote:
> There is reason in (X)HTML metatagging to follow a convention:
>
> <meta name="dcterms:modified" content="2013-13-13"/>
>
> versus
> <meta name="dc.date.modified" content="2013-13-13"/>
Sure, there is some reason... but it is also the case that *none* of the
relevant DCMI documents recommend such an approach:
RFC-2731 - Encoding Dublin Core in HTML
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2731.txt
Expressing Qualified Dublin Core in HTML/XHTML meta elements
DRAFT
http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/dcmi/dcq-html/
Recording qualified Dublin Core metadata in HTML meta elements
Working draft
http://dublincore.org/documents/2000/08/15/dcq-html/
In all these documents, the recommended approach is
<meta name="DC.date.modified" content="2013-13-13" />
(ignoring the case of element and refinement names and the trailling slash
on the (X)HTML element).
Andy
--
Distributed Systems, UKOLN, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK
http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/ukoln/staff/a.powell +44 1225 383933
Resource Discovery Network http://www.rdn.ac.uk/
|