>
> agentRoles can be confusing
Dears,
there is a dc-agents working group.
Do we discuss a proposal which reflects
consensus of that group or do we just
informally exchange our views on dc:CCP
and other approaches to agentRoles?
subProperty relations between CCP itself
have been discussed at the Tokio meeting
a year ago in a face to face meeting.
I left that meeting with the impression
there will be further discussion in
dc:agents on the case.
Anything known about?
The dc:publisher role is not subordinated to
dc:contributor
In fact, when you publish historical documents
your customers would be rightly upset when you take
the freedom to make contributions to the content.
This is typical for agentRoles which
address some kind of trade with given
stuff.
When one wants a terminal to a class of
agentRoles one openly should call
such a terminal property something like
"agent" (as a short for "hasAsAgent" as "creator"
is a short for "hasAsCreator"),
but i'm NOT in favour to shoe-horne all such
roles in dc:contributor.
rs
|