JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Archives


MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Archives

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Archives


MEDIEVAL-RELIGION@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Home

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Home

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION  July 2002

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION July 2002

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Necrologies, Obituaries &c - was Visitation &c

From:

[log in to unmask]

Reply-To:

Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 11 Jul 2002 00:02:16 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (144 lines)

medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture

Since I am currently working on a dissertation based on mortuary rolls, I
thought I might comment on one part of this discussion:


Quoting Christopher Crockett <[log in to unmask]>:

> "Ms Brenda M. Cook" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> >There is the additional point of the OBITUARY SCROLLS of senior
> ecclesiastics
>
> and, not just the Seniores, but many Lesser Lights as well, including (as
> best
> we can tell) quite ordinary monks.

Yep, some houses seem to have circulated rolls just for major figures but
others sent out rolls for "ordinary monks."  Rolls were only sent out, however,
for members of the community; for example, if a roll honors a patron, it
invariably turns out that the patron joined the community prior to his death.
>
> >- those things that went the rounds from monastery to monastery
>
> the result of, what were they called?, "confraternities" (?) between the
> various abbeys --agreements to share (or commonly pool) the commemoration
> of
> their departed members.

Yes, they were called confraternities, but the link between rolls and
confraternities is not as neat as previously supposed.  For example, I have
compared the confraternity agreements of Solignac with the houses contributing
to the mortuary roll of Hugh of Solignac in 1240.  Solignac appears to have
been in confraternity with 37 communities in 1240, but only 9 of those
communities contributed to the roll (5 Benedictine houses, 1 Cistercian house,
3 groups of canons), even though the roll contains tituli (entries) from 350
communities.  Most notably, Fleury and St. Martial of Limoges had long-standing
confraternity with Solignac (dating from 942); St. Martial and SOlignac
commemorated one another's dead each year on the same day in February.  Yet
there are no tituli from these houses on Hugh's roll, although they
contributed to other rolls.  Conques established a confraternity arrangement
with Solignac sometime between 1176-1178; but although Conques frequently
contributed to mortuary rolls, it did not appear on Hugh's roll either.

My theory is that some closely related houses might have been contacted with
prayer requests immediately after Hugh's death, because of their connections to
Solignac.  The roll was not issued for some months after his death, and perhaps
the houses were not contacted again because they had already commemorated Hugh
in their own way.  It was the prayers that mattered, after all, not the
notation on the roll acknowledging a request for prayer.



> >to have laudatory comments added on.
>
> sometimes with additions; but frequently --most often, if i recall-- just
> the
> list of names was enough.

And sometimes not-so-laudatory comments, as the outrageous "All abbesses
deserve to die" verse on a mortuary roll that caught the eye of Southern and
was quoted in his Making of the Middle Ages.  It was this reference that piqued
my curiosity and led to my dissertation topic.  Many rolls, as you say, have
only lists of names for whom prayer is requested but there are plenty of rolls,
esp. from the 12th century, that contain verse contributions from many of the
houses visited.  About half the houses contributing to the roll of Abbess
Mathilda of Holy Trinity, Caen-- the roll with the "all abbesses deserve to
die" verse-- just added a simple RIP and list of dead and about half
contributed verses which might or might not have much to do with the dead
abbess, depending on a number of factors including the relationship between the
contributing house and Holy Trinity.


> much to the chagrin of modern Scholarship.
>
> the main thing was, apparently (and as i understand it) to get the guy's
> Name
> in the Book, so that the commemoratory and spiritually salubrious Ju-Ju can
> be
> set in motion.
>
> >Probably not enough evidence has survived, but has anyone tried to collate
> the entries on an obituary scroll with the entries in the necrologies of
> the
> contributing abbeys ?

 I had hoped to do that as part of my dissertation work, but it doesn't look
like I'll have the time.  Someday, though.....

>
> i believe the Urpublication of the Rolls is :
>
> L. DELISLE, Rouleaux des Morts du IX au XV siecle, Paris 1866
>
> there should be some more up-to-date stuff on them in the Huyghebaert i
> mentioned above, since they are certainly "documents nécrologiques."

Delisle is wonderful, with tons of examples collected in one yummy package.  he
also did an edition of an extant roll for Vital of Savigny, and included
photographs of the entire roll.  There you'll find what is believed to be the
actual handwriting of Heloise, who most probably wrote the verse for the
Argenteuil and may well have added it to the roll herself.

If anyone needs more recent bibliography, backchannel me.  Huyghebaert does
have some references.  Very little has been written in English on rolls,
unfortunately.  Steer clear, btw, of Jean-Claude Kahn's "Les moines messagers,"
which purports to use mortuary rolls to discern changing attitudes toward death
over several centuries.  It's a mess.

>
> our problem here is that such intensive work would probably only appear in
> a
> monographic publication dealing with the necrological sourses for, say, a
> given house and wouldn't necessarily show up in some more generalized
> discussion of the subject.
>
> >To see if the commemoration dates would fit with the possible date the
> scroll
> arrived and was added to.
>
> worth doing, for sure.
>
> let me know if i can help you do it with the Chartres material.
>
> i'll hold your coat.

If anyone IS working on such a project, I'd love to hear about it.


Teresa Leslie
Emory University

**********************************************************************
To join the list, send the message: join medieval-religion YOUR NAME
to: [log in to unmask]
To send a message to the list, address it to:
[log in to unmask]
To leave the list, send the message: leave medieval-religion
to: [log in to unmask]
In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to:
[log in to unmask]
For further information, visit our web site:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/medieval-religion.html

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager