Thanks for the comments. My students were happy with unit, but moaned about
the income elasticity question.
>From: David Lewis <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: For teachers and lecturers interested in curriculum issues
> affecting the te <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: AQA Unit one and two
>Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 17:56:14 +0100
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Paul Garwood <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 1:29 PM
>Subject: Re: AQA Unit one and two
>
>
> > Like most of the other respondents I have seen worse papers. No major
>trick
> > questions, questions could be clearly linked to syllabus and students
>who
> > revised well should have done OK.
> >
>
>Likewise. Even the income elasticity question on paper 1 wasn't the end of
>the world, as the rest of the paper really was pretty straightforward.
>Actually, most of my students didn't take it as they did well enough in
>January. But those who did reckoned it was easier than the January paper.
>
>As for Unit 2, I'll be having serious words with those of my students who
>didn't even attempt the matrix structure question, especially as the case
>material explained what it meant! All they had to do was have a sensible
>guess at its benefits.
>
>Cheers
>
>David
Nicky
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
|