> From [log in to unmask] Wed Feb 13 22:49 MET 2002
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 16:49:14 -0500
> From: "Wagner,Harry" <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: Updated charter and WG web page
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> Hi Pete,
>
> > ... I think the presence of "note" and
> > "release"
> > in the RDF Schema _may_ be the legacy of an early draft of the
> > Qualifiers document, but I don't think they should be "in the current
> > terms namespace"? Is "classification" another such culprit?
>
> "note" and "release" have been defined in the terms NS (for right or wrong)
> for at least the last year. Do they belong there?
NO! The file is wrong.
> I'm not the person to
> answer that question. If you know who that person is, please direct them my
> way :)
>
> Cheers... harry
>
|