> From [log in to unmask] Sun Feb 17 16:15 MET 2002
> Mail-Followup-To: [log in to unmask]
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Disposition: inline
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i
> X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 5.7 - http://www.vim.org/
> X-OS: Linux 2.2.19-6.2.10 i586
> X-Uptime: 2:59pm up 45 days, 22:14, 6 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
> X-PGP-Key: http://chris.croome.net/pgp.html
> X-PGP-KeyID: 0x8BB2DE91
> Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 15:15:55 +0000
> From: Chris Croome <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: HTML Guidelines
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> Hi
>
> On Fri 15-Feb-2002 at 09:00:24 +0100, Roland Schwaenzl wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri 15-Feb-2002 at 05:20:51 +0000, Chris Croome wrote:
> > >
> > > Another inconsistency I noticed the other day is that some documents
> > > specify how to link to an external DC file, for example this one:
> > >
> > > http://dublincore.org/documents/2001/11/28/dcmes-xml/
> > >
> > > Suggests this:
> > >
> > > <LINK REL="meta" HREF="mydoc.dcxml">
> > >
> > > Other documents don't have any suggestions on how to link to the
> > > files, for example this one:
> > >
> > > http://dublincore.org/documents/2001/11/30/dcq-rdf-xml/
> >
> > The paper deliberately does not develop an own/separate position on
> > this.
>
> Fair enough, but if the DCMI is _not_ going to suggest how people should
> link from (X)HTML to qualified DC RDF metadata
Well: There is planned a "gentle intro" as separate paper.
I take your concern as suggestion to explicitly include a remark
in there. Would that meet your needs?
rs
> then _why_ is there a
> recomendation about how to link from (X)HTML to unqualified DC RDF
> metadata?
>
> It still strikes me as inconsistent, but perhaps I'm missing something?
> Is there a better way to do it?
>
> Chris
>
> --
> Chris Croome <[log in to unmask]>
> web design http://www.webarchitects.co.uk/
> web content management http://mkdoc.com/
> everything else http://chris.croome.net/
>
|