Thank you, Neil. I am aware of the FISH e-conference, of the need to be
clear about the distinction between evidence and interpretation and of the
relationship between legally protected areas and the underlying monument.
What I was hoping for was some practical advice from SMRs who have longer
experience of GIS and have explored some of the
potential problems.
Julia
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neil Campling [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 09:24
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Digitising monument polygons on GIS
>
> Dear Julia,
>
> Contact Ed Lee ( [log in to unmask] ) on the FISH group for the
> proceedings of the e-mail conference last November on GIS standards and
> digitising boundaries. Don't confuse "evidence" with "monuments":
> monuments are interpretations / understandings of evidence. And Scheduled
> Areas are legally defined areas which may (or may not) contain all or some
> of a monument, depending on how we think about that monument.
> Cheers,
> Neil
>
**** Buckinghamshire County Council E-mail Disclaimer ****
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity
to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended
recipient, the use of the information by disclosure, copying
or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have
received this email in error please notify the system manager
at [log in to unmask]
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been
swept by MailSweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
**** End of Disclaimer *********************************************
|