From: Osher Doctorow [log in to unmask], Fri. Jan. 18, 2002 11:36AM
I agree with Julian, especially about the P.S.
Osher
----- Original Message -----
From: <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 5:05 AM
Subject: Re: CoPG10 - CONFIDENTIALITY OF RECORDS
> I suspect that the confused phrasing that Ray draws attention to
represents
> a collision between what appear to be praiseworthy intentions on the part
of
> some within National Statistics, on the one hand, and the traditional
Civil
> Service/establishment view that subjects' (in the sense of "Her Majesty's
> subjects") information is confidential in the sense that officialdom
> undertakes not to reveal it to anyone outside its own ranks -- but is fair
> game for anyone within them.
>
> Julian
>
> PS many thanks to Ray for his detailed work on the CoP, and for keeping
the
> list so well informed about the issues.
>
> ******************************************************
> Please note that if you press the 'Reply' button your
> message will go only to the sender of this message.
> If you want to reply to the whole list, use your mailer's
> 'Reply-to-All' button to send your message automatically
> to [log in to unmask]
> *******************************************************
******************************************************
Please note that if you press the 'Reply' button your
message will go only to the sender of this message.
If you want to reply to the whole list, use your mailer's
'Reply-to-All' button to send your message automatically
to [log in to unmask]
*******************************************************
|