[log in to unmask] writes:
>That's a can of worms! There have been extensive and expensive court
>battles on exactly this question, whether a Dyson *is* more effective for
>a longer period because its airflow is not filtered through a bag.
>I forget the outcome - someone else can check the cuttings - but think it
>prudent to warn list members that this is not a topic for throw-away
>remarks ;-)
I hope people noted my judicious use of "arguably"
I also said that some people (eg with allergies) may have fewer problems with
dust in the air.
Chris Rust
|