JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN Archives


ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN Archives

ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN Archives


ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN Home

ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN Home

ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN  2002

ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN 2002

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Retention of printed lab reports by wards

From:

"Graham, Billy" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Graham, Billy

Date:

Thu, 22 Aug 2002 15:33:11 +0100

Content-Type:

multipart/mixed

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (187 lines) , InterScan_Disclaimer.txt (36 lines)

Hi Jeffrey,

It's not totally academic for two reasons,
[1] if it is not legally required to produce hard-copy reports and the ward
in question don't want hard-copy reports we could possibly write (software)
logic rules to prevent them being issued from the lab computer in the first
place (or get our lab computer software company to modify the software to
allow us to easily exclude individual sources for reports), and
[2] more and more of our wards have their own computer systems to which we
transmit laboratory results on a drip-feed basis (such as separate ICU,
Renal, Cancer, Diabetic and A/E systems along with a number of GP links to
various GP practices). Only the A/E system currently doesn't get lab results
returned electronically - we only use the A/E link to pull patient
demographics into the lab system (via the PAS system). All wards can still
access the lab results directly from the lab computer through terminals /
PCs whether or not they have their own computer system with down-loaded lab
results.

I'm not sure what you mean exactly by "...the secure, integrated EPR storage
in the hospital?". As far as I am aware there is no 'proper' EPR that
totally integrates all patient information, though I know the standards for
this are being developed at present. As far as the data on the lab computer
is concerned it is as secure as the IT department's normal procedures allow
it to be, i.e. the server is in a secure room and daily backups are
performed in a ?3-weekly cycle and removed off site to a fire-safe location.

"The rules apply to the original records, not their transcriptions, be they
paper or electronic."
Surely the electronic records ARE the original records?

I think as Jonathan has commented earlier...
"No-one knows if it is legally OK to only have computerised records"
means the answer to my original question is ... "we don't know - yet!"

Thanks again.

Billy.


-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey Davies [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 22 August 2002 14:54
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Retention of printed lab reports by wards


An interesting point, but academic as you do still issue paper reports, and
others on the mail base are probably more aware than I of the electronic
patient record issues. Do your laboratory computers form part of the secure,
integrated EPR storage in the hospital?
The rules apply to the original records, not their transcriptions, be they
paper or electronic. The only exception is microfilm/microfiche which is
acceptable  in law as an exact copy. From memory, paper medical records (or
their immutable images) on adults are retained for at least 8 years from the
time they are last accessed; childrens' records are retained for at least 25
years.
Regards,
Jeff Davies
>>> "Graham, Billy" <[log in to unmask]> 08/22/02 02:06pm >>>
Hi Jeffrey,

Thanks for your reply and all those others I have received both via the list
and direct to my e-mail address.

I notice in the text you quoted that...
"Diagnostic records are properly retained in individual patient notes or in
electronic form..."
the bit I am interested in is the OR word...
"Diagnostic records are properly retained in individual patient notes OR in
electronic form..."

Does this mean it can be an either/or situation as I interpret it from your
quote?
In other words if the ward have their 'Diagnostic records', which I assume
covers lab reports, stored in electronic form (in most cases on laboratory
computer) they can dispose of the hard-copy reports (which brings me back to
the original question).

Regards,   Billy.




-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey Davies [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 22 August 2002 13:45
To: Graham, Billy; [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Retention of printed lab reports by wards


Dear Billy,
The College guidelines summarise admirably:
"Diagnostic records are properly retained in individual patient notes or in
electronic form, the safe keeping of which is the responsibility of hospital
records departments or recipient general practitioners or private
practitioners, once the pathologist has issued the reports. Where
pathologists have reason to doubt the reliability of systems of patient
record keeping, they should bring this to the attention of those
responsible rather than attempt to rectify it by duplication and local and
prolonged laboratory storage of diagnostic records."
The practice you describe is appalling and should be reported to your
hospital management.
Regards,
Jeff Davies

>>> "Graham, Billy" <[log in to unmask]> 08/21/02 04:52pm >>>
Hi,

Does anyone have information on how long wards must legally keep hard-copy
laboratory reports, if at all, assuming they will always be available
electronically via the lab computer (both active and historical records).
This query came to me from the nursing staff. Currently the ward in question
receives lab reports and the nurses filter out any showing 'abnormal'
results. The medical staff then look up these patient records in the lab
computer and take appropriate action. Following this, all the hard-copy
reports are filed away alphabetically in boxes dating back 7 years - the
reports are NOT stored with the patient record. These hard-copy archives are
taking up a lot of room and much staff time in operation of the filing
system.

I think if the retention of the hard copies is not a legal requirement the
ward would like to file them in the drawer labelled 'bin' rather than waste
time and space filing them as they currently do.

Any advice would be much welcomed.

Best regards,   Billy Graham.



------ACB discussion List Information--------
This is an open discussion list for the academic and clinical
community working in clinical biochemistry.
Please note, archived messages are public and can be viewed
via the internet. Views expressed are those of the individual and
they are responsible for all message content.

ACB Web Site
http://www.acb.org.uk
List Archives
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html
List Instructions (How to leave etc.)
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/

------ACB discussion List Information--------
This is an open discussion list for the academic and clinical
community working in clinical biochemistry.
Please note, archived messages are public and can be viewed
via the internet. Views expressed are those of the individual and
they are responsible for all message content.

ACB Web Site
http://www.acb.org.uk
List Archives
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html
List Instructions (How to leave etc.)
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/

------ACB discussion List Information--------
This is an open discussion list for the academic and clinical
community working in clinical biochemistry.
Please note, archived messages are public and can be viewed
via the internet. Views expressed are those of the individual and
they are responsible for all message content.

ACB Web Site
http://www.acb.org.uk
List Archives
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html
List Instructions (How to leave etc.)
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/

------ACB discussion List Information--------
This is an open discussion list for the academic and clinical
community working in clinical biochemistry.
Please note, archived messages are public and can be viewed
via the internet. Views expressed are those of the individual and
they are responsible for all message content.

ACB Web Site
http://www.acb.org.uk
List Archives
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html
List Instructions (How to leave etc.)
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/



***************************************************************** This email has been Virus Scanned. Privileged/Confidential Information and/or Copyright Material may be contained in this e-mail. The information and Material is intended for the use of the intended addressee. If you are not the intended addressee, or the person responsible for delivering it to the intended addressee, you may not copy or deliver it to anyone else or use it in any unauthorised manner. To do so is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you receive this e-mail by mistake, advise the sender immediately by using the reply facility in your e-mail software. Thank you. ICT Department Belfast City Hospital Trust ***************************************************************** ------ACB discussion List Information-------- This is an open discussion list for the academic and clinical community working in clinical biochemistry. Please note, archived messages are public and can be viewed via the internet. Views expressed are those of the individual and they are responsible for all message content. ACB Web Site http://www.acb.org.uk List Archives http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html List Instructions (How to leave etc.) http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager