Coming back to this thread again...
One of the labs to which we refer some tests has sent a letter to heads of
department requesting that no mention is made of their identity in any
"rebadged" reports issued locally. This is because they do not wish to be
held responsible for reports they have not produced if the local lab
transcribes incorrectly. How does this square with the new CPA regs? For
just one SAS lab this isn't a problem, but if they all took the same view
we'd be stuck.
Paul Masters
------ACB discussion List Information--------
This is an open discussion list for the academic and clinical
community working in clinical biochemistry.
Please note, archived messages are public and can be viewed
via the internet. Views expressed are those of the individual and
they are responsible for all message content.
ACB Web Site
http://www.acb.org.uk
List Archives
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html
List Instructions (How to leave etc.)
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/
|