JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ENVIROETHICS Archives


ENVIROETHICS Archives

ENVIROETHICS Archives


enviroethics@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ENVIROETHICS Home

ENVIROETHICS Home

ENVIROETHICS  2002

ENVIROETHICS 2002

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Global Warming Anyone?

From:

John Foster <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Discussion forum for environmental ethics.

Date:

Tue, 19 Mar 2002 19:09:18 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (117 lines)

----- Original Message -----
From: brad bartholomew <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 6:12 PM
Subject: Re: Global Warming Anyone?


> Quoted from the link Lisa sent - "Scientists stopped
> short of blaming the collapse on global warming caused
> by human activity."
>
> >From an ethical point of view this is reprehnsible.
> ALL scientists should by now be screaming for
> population reduction.
>

Brad, this may be part of the solution but it is not a universal, nor
comprehensive solution to prevent lasting ecological harm. The belief that
the carrying capacity of the earth is being exceeded for humans is probably
true in some situations. For instance in Africa where there are frequent
cases of droughts and mass starvation. The same has happened in the Asian
subcontinent, and there are local or regional food shortages elsewhere
(depending on whether there are marginalized groups living there, eg Haiti
in the Western Hemisphere). Malnutrition is a factor in the growth and
development of children living below the poverty level in many US cities, as
it is elsewhere in the developed world.

However, I think that using one mechanism for controlling population growth
is not the best policy. I think 'family planning' and 'education' would be
more facilitative in the long run than an exclusive reliance on abortion
clinics. There are some who feel that abortions are wrong, and thus would be
likely to not use abortion clinics. Abortion should not be used as a means
of 'birth control' because it is actually a bit unsafe as a medical
procedure depending on where and who is treated. Up to 1% of women suffer
some complications which potentially could compromise their health. Secondly
it is only in those countries with adequate social funds that provide for
safe and free abortion clinics which would be of assistence to the majority
of women who chose to have an abortion. Therefore in many countries with
high birth rates there are a lack of adequate clinics...so the reality is
that education would be preferred so that partners did no risk an unwanted
pregnancy.

It is important to realize that many Catholic countries do not provide 'free
abortion clinics' and many of these countries are situated in the Americas
where the birth rate is coming down because of increased rates of education
and employment rates. I think the solution has to include education and
health services which are affordable for the poorest and the best qualified.

In addition to clinics there would need to be;

1.    basic public services such as primary and secondary education;

2.    access to basic health services;

3.    access to inexpensive loans to develop economic opportunities; and

4.    access to affordable higher education.

Unless these were provided in addition to clinics, there can be no (a)
efficiency and (b) no equity.

Without social and economic policies which promote equality to basic health
and education services, there can be no progress in halting
'over-exploitation' which is largely a problem associate with developed
nations which consumer the vast amount of natural resources....

Eg. the per capita rate of wood consumption in the US is 300 kg/year,
whereas in the Sudan and in Peru, where wood is used as fuel, the per capita
rate of wood consumption is between 0.1 and 0.3 kg per year.

The US uses on a per capita basis up to 25 % of the world's natural
resources, but has less than 5% of the world's population. In Afghanistan,
for instance, there are many children affected by blindness, a condition
which could have been cheaply and easily prevented by the simple
adminstration of antibiotics which cost less than $1.00 US.

chao

John Foster












> The southern hemisphere has had an horrendous summer.
> The heat in Australia is intolerable, and we haven't
> had any decent rain for almost a year. Over the xmas
> period the whole country seemed to be on fire.
>
> There is no "greenhouse" effect here. All those
> lunatic futuristic movies like Mad Max which depicts
> the landscape of the future as a barren, toxic desert
> are coming to pass.
>
> There should be a free abortion clinic in every
> village in every country in the developing world. The
> developed countries should immediately cease ALL
> immigration and let their populations go into natural
> decline.
>
> If the human race does not immediately try to reduce
> itself, we're doomed.
>
> Brad
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage
> http://sports.yahoo.com/

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
May 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
February 2018
January 2018
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
September 2016
August 2016
June 2016
May 2016
March 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
October 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
November 2012
October 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
July 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
October 2008
September 2008
July 2008
June 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
October 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager