The pair of you might reconsider the subject header or this exchange -
especially the bit about 'rationality'.
Damian
> Steve, it doesn't sound to me like you have read Deleuze and Guattari at
all if you consider the very basic distinctions made below between a
semiotics influence by Pierce and a semiotics influenced by Saussure to
be 'ramble'. Further, there a number of references to Jung's use of anima
and animus in Deleuze's early work which would be problematic if they
were not then taken through the theses of Difference and Repetitions.
What we have is disagreement, where you clearly have not read the works
being discussed and which you would, therefore, like to dismiss as
non-intelligent becuase it 'differs' from your position. This is called crass
dogmatism, an academic 'ritual' I, for one, have no further desire to
participate in.
> Ruth.C
|