> From [log in to unmask] Wed Dec 19 13:55 MET 2001
> X-Authentication-Warning: twister.gmd.de: tbaker owned process doing -bs
> X-Sender: [log in to unmask]
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 13:55:42 +0100
> From: Thomas Baker <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: dc definition tag
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, Roland Schwaenzl wrote:
> > > In ISO: 11179 Pt 3 Comment is defined as :
> > >
> > > Comments: Remarks on the data element
> > >
> > > whereas DC: description is defined as
> > >
> > > Description - An account of the content of the resource.
> > >
> > > I don't think these can be equated.
> >
> > dc:description could include other things also.
> >
> > One could do with a refimement. But is it really necessary?
>
> Roland,
>
> Do you think 11179:comments already fall within the scope of
> dc:description as it is currently defined,
Yupp.
rs
> or are you suggesting that
> dc:description could be defined (or interpreted) to include such other
> things?
>
> Tom
>
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> Dr. Thomas Baker [log in to unmask]
> Birlinghoven Library, Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft
> Institutszentrum Schloss Birlinghoven +49-2241-14-2352
> 53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany fax +49-2241-14-2619
>
|